Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNæss, Lars Eide
dc.contributor.authorKrüger, Andreas Jørstad
dc.contributor.authorUleberg, Oddvar
dc.contributor.authorHaugland, Helge
dc.contributor.authorDale, Jostein
dc.contributor.authorWattø, Jon-Ola
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Sara Marie
dc.contributor.authorAsheim, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T10:19:33Z
dc.date.available2024-01-15T10:19:33Z
dc.date.created2024-01-08T13:48:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111474
dc.description.abstractBackground Ambulance response times are considered important. Busy ambulances are common, but little is known about their effect on response times. Objective To assess the extent of busy ambulances in Central Norway and their impact on ambulance response times. Design This was a retrospective observational study. We used machine learning on data from nearby incidents to assess the probability of up to five different ambulances being candidates to respond to a medical emergency incident. For each incident, the probability of a busy ambulance was estimated by summing the probabilities of candidate ambulances being busy at the time of the incident. The difference in response time that may be attributable to busy ambulances was estimated by comparing groups of nearby incidents with different estimated busy probabilities. Setting Medical emergency incidents with ambulance response in Central Norway from 2013 to 2022. Main outcome measures Prevalence of busy ambulances and differences in response times associated with busy ambulances. Results The estimated probability of busy ambulances for all 216,787 acute incidents with ambulance response was 26.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.6 to 26.9). Comparing nearby incidents, each 10-percentage point increase in the probability of a busy ambulance was associated with a delay of 0.60 minutes (95% CI 0.58 to 0.62). For incidents in rural and urban areas, the probability of a busy ambulance was 21.6% (95% CI 21.5 to 21.8) and 35.0% (95% CI 34.8 to 35.2), respectively. The delay associated with a 10-percentage point increase in busy probability was 0.81 minutes (95% CI 0.78 to 0.84) and 0.30 minutes (95% CI 0.28 to 0.32), respectively. Conclusion Ambulances were often busy, which was associated with delayed ambulance response times. In rural areas, the probability of busy ambulances was lower, although the potentially longer delays when ambulances were busy made these areas more vulnerable.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science, PLOSen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUsing machine learning to assess the extent of busy ambulances and its impact on ambulance response times: A retrospective observational studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeUsing machine learning to assess the extent of busy ambulances and its impact on ambulance response times: A retrospective observational studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume19en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0296308
dc.identifier.cristin2222366
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 295989en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0296308en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal