Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMoen, Martine Kjølberg
dc.contributor.authorLøhre, Erik T
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Gunnhild
dc.contributor.authorThronæs, Morten
dc.contributor.authorKlepstad, Pål
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T09:56:18Z
dc.date.available2023-02-06T09:56:18Z
dc.date.created2022-04-09T14:27:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationCancers. 2022, 14 (7), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3048496
dc.description.abstractSimple Summary Approximately one-quarter of the patients with advanced cancer acutely admitted to the Palliative Care Unit at St. Olav’s University Hospital received intravenous antibiotics. We observed that physiological variables and paraclinical findings in patients with and without infections differed at admission but observed no differences in patient-reported outcome measures. Patients admitted for infection had no shorter life expectancy than patients without infections. We did not observe any difference in the prescription of antibiotics to patients with ongoing anti-cancer therapy (integrated pathway) compared to patients with no ongoing cancer therapy (palliative care pathway). This information increases the knowledge about the use of antibiotic therapy in palliative cancer care. Abstract Decision-making for antibiotic therapy in palliative cancer care implies avoiding futile interventions and to identify patients who benefit from treatment. We evaluated patient-reported outcome-measures (PROMs), physiological findings, and survival in palliative cancer care patients hospitalized with an infection. All acute admissions during one year, directly to a University Hospital unit that provided integrated services, were included. Serious infection was defined as a need to start intravenous antibiotics. PROMs, clinical and paraclinical variables, and survival were obtained. Sixty-two of 257 patients received intravenous antibiotic treatment. PROMs were generally similar in the infection group and the non-infection group, both in respect to intensities at admission and improvements during the stay. There were more physiological and paraclinical deviations at admission in patients in the infection group. These deviations improved during the stay. Survival was not poorer in the infection group compared to the non-infection group. Patients in integrated cancer care were as likely to be put on intravenous antibiotics but had longer survival. In integrated oncology and palliative cancer services, patients with an infection had similar outcomes as those without an infection. This argues that the use of intravenous antibiotics is appropriate in many patients admitted to palliative care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAntibiotic Therapy in Integrated Oncology and Palliative Cancer Care: An Observational Studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeAntibiotic Therapy in Integrated Oncology and Palliative Cancer Care: An Observational Studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalCancersen_US
dc.source.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers14071602
dc.identifier.cristin2016360
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal