Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarcuzzi, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBach, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorNordstoga, Anne Lovise
dc.contributor.authorBertheussen, Gro Falkener
dc.contributor.authorAshikhmin, Ilya
dc.contributor.authorBoldermo, Nora
dc.contributor.authorKvarner, Else-Norun
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Tom Ivar Lund
dc.contributor.authorMarchand, Gunn Hege
dc.contributor.authorOse, Solveig Osborg
dc.contributor.authorAasdahl, Lene
dc.contributor.authorKaspersen, Silje Lill
dc.contributor.authorBardal, Ellen Marie
dc.contributor.authorBørke, Janne-Birgitte
dc.contributor.authorMork, Paul Jarle
dc.contributor.authorGismervik, Sigmund Østgård
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-22T07:41:29Z
dc.date.available2022-09-22T07:41:29Z
dc.date.created2021-10-27T13:08:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2021, 11 (9), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3020521
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP) are common and costly conditions. Self-management is a key element in the care of persistent LBP and NP. Artificial intelligence can be used to support and tailor self-management interventions, but their effectiveness needs to be ascertained. The aims of this trial are (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of an individually tailored app-based self-management intervention (selfBACK) adjunct to usual care in people with LBP and/or NP in secondary care compared with usual care only, and (2) to compare the effectiveness of selfBACK with a web-based self-management intervention without individual tailoring (e-Help). Methods and analysis: This is a randomised, assessor-blind clinical trial with three parallel arms: (1) selfBACK app adjunct to usual care; (2) e-Help website adjunct to usual care and (3) usual care only. Patients referred to St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim (Norway) with LBP and/or NP and accepted for assessment/treatment at the multidisciplinary outpatient clinic for back or neck rehabilitation are invited to the study. Eligible and consenting participants are randomised to one of the three arms with equal allocation ratio. We aim to include 279 participants (93 in each arm). Outcome variables are assessed at baseline (before randomisation) and at 6-week, 3-month and 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome is musculoskeletal health measured by the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire at 3 months. A mixed-methods process evaluation will document patients' and clinicians' experiences with the interventions. A health economic evaluation will estimate the cost-effectiveness of both interventions' adjunct to usual care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIndividually tailored self-management app-based intervention (selfBACK) versus a self-management web-based intervention (e-Help) or usual care in people with low back and neck pain referred to secondary care: protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trialen_US
dc.title.alternativeIndividually tailored self-management app-based intervention (selfBACK) versus a self-management web-based intervention (e-Help) or usual care in people with low back and neck pain referred to secondary care: protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US
dc.source.volume11en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047921
dc.identifier.cristin1948895
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal