Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMikkelsen, Vilde Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorHong, Yan Dai
dc.contributor.authorStensjøen, Anne Line
dc.contributor.authorBerntsen, Erik Magnus
dc.contributor.authorSalvesen, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Ole
dc.contributor.authorTorp, Sverre Helge
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-08T06:22:59Z
dc.date.available2020-09-08T06:22:59Z
dc.date.created2020-08-10T07:59:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 2020, 79 (8), 855-862.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3069
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2676750
dc.description.abstractO6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is an important favorable predictive marker in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We hypothesized that MGMT status could be a surrogate marker of pretreatment tumor biology observed as histopathological and radiological features. Apart from some radiological studies aiming to noninvasively predict the MGMT status, few studies have investigated relationships between MGMT status and phenotypical tumor biology. We have therefore aimed to investigate such relationships in 85 isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type GBMs. MGMT status was determined by methylation-specific PCR and was assessed for associations with 22 histopathological features, immunohistochemical proliferative index and microvessel density measurements, conventional magnetic resonance imaging characteristics, preoperative speed of tumor growth, and overall survival. None of the investigated histological or radiological features were significantly associated with MGMT status. Methylated MGMT status was a significant independent predictor of improved overall survival. In conclusion, our results suggest that MGMT status is not related to the pretreatment phenotypical biology in IDH wild-type GBMs. Furthermore, our findings suggest the survival benefit of MGMT methylated GBMs is not due to an inherently less aggressive tumor biology, and that conventional magnetic resonance imaging features cannot be used to noninvasively predict the MGMT status.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMGMT Promoter Methylation Status Is Not Related to Histological or Radiological Features in IDH Wild-type Glioblastomasen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber855-862en_US
dc.source.volume79en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurologyen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jnen/nlaa060
dc.identifier.cristin1822301
dc.description.localcodeVC 2020 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. 855 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.comen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal