Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGiskeødegård, Guro F.
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Trygve
dc.contributor.authorBertilsson, Helena
dc.contributor.authorTessem, May-Britt
dc.contributor.authorBathen, Tone Frost
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T06:46:58Z
dc.date.available2019-10-15T06:46:58Z
dc.date.created2019-09-12T15:00:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationAnalytica Chimica Acta. 2019, 1081 93-102.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0003-2670
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2622110
dc.description.abstractMetabolomics analysis of biofluids is a feasible tool for disease characterization and monitoring due to its minimally invasive nature. To reduce unwanted variation in biobanks and clinical studies, it is important to determine the effect of external factors on metabolic profiles of biofluids. In this study we examined the effect of sample collection and sample processing procedures on NMR measured serum lipoproteins and small-molecule metabolites in serum and urine, using a cohort of men diagnosed with either prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia. We determined day-to-day reliability of metabolites by systematic sample collection at two different days, in both fasting and non-fasting conditions. Study participants received prostate massage the first day to assess the differences between urine with and without prostate secretions. Further, metabolic differences between first-void and mid-stream urine samples, and the effect of centrifugation of urine samples before storage were assessed. Our results show that day-to-day reliability is highly variable between metabolites in both serum and urine, while lipoprotein subfractions possess high reliability. Further, fasting status clearly influenced the metabolite concentrations, demonstrating the importance of keeping this condition constant within a study cohort. Day-to-day reliabilities were however comparable in fasting and non-fasting samples. Urine sampling procedures such as sampling of first-void or mid-stream urine, and centrifugation or not before sample storage, were shown to only have minimal effect on the overall metabolic profile, and is thus unlikely to constitute a confounder in clinical studies utilizing NMR derived metabolomics.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe effect of sampling procedures and day-to-day variations in metabolomics studies of biofluidsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber93-102nb_NO
dc.source.volume1081nb_NO
dc.source.journalAnalytica Chimica Actanb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aca.2019.07.026
dc.identifier.cristin1724075
dc.relation.projectEU/758306nb_NO
dc.description.localcode© 2019. This is the authors’ accepted and refereed manuscript to the article. Locked until 17.7.2020 due to copyright restrictions. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,25,0
cristin.unitcode194,65,15,0
cristin.unitcode1920,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
cristin.unitnameKirurgisk klinikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal