Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSletten, Reidun
dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Ola B.
dc.contributor.authorOldervoll, Line Merethe
dc.contributor.authorÅstrøm, Lennart
dc.contributor.authorSkjellegrind, Håvard Kjesbu
dc.contributor.authorSaltyte Benth, Jurate
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorBergh, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorGrønberg, Bjørn Henning
dc.contributor.authorRostoft, Siri
dc.contributor.authorBye, Asta
dc.contributor.authorMork, Paul Jarle
dc.contributor.authorSlaaen, Marit
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T06:19:51Z
dc.date.available2024-07-24T06:19:51Z
dc.date.created2024-03-04T10:23:08Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Urology, 59, 31–38.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-1805
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3142990
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to investigate the associations between age at radical prostate cancer treatment and long-term global quality of life (QoL), physical function (PF), and treatment-related side effects. Material and Methods: This single-center, cross-sectional study included men treated for localized prostate cancer with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 2014–2018. Global QoL and PF were assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30), side effects by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Adjusted linear regression models were estimated to assess associations between age (continuous variable) at treatment and outcomes. QLQ-C30 scores were compared to normative data after dividing the cohort in two groups, <70 years and ≥70 years at treatment. Results: Of 654 men included, 516 (79%) had undergone RARP, and 138 (21%) had undergone EBRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy for 93%. Mean time since treatment was 57 months. Median age at treatment was 68 (min–max 44–84) years. We found no statistically significant independent association between age at treatment and global QoL, PF or side effects, except for sexual function (regression coefficient [RC] −0.77; p < 0.001) and hormonal/vitality (RC 0.30; p = 0.006) function. Mean QLQ-C30 scores were slightly poorer than age-adjusted normative scores, for men <70 years (n = 411) as well as for men ≥70 years (n = 243) at treatment, but the differences were not beyond clinical significance. Conclusions: In this cohort of prostate cancer survivors, age at treatment had little impact on long-term QoL and function. Due to the cross-sectional design, short term impact or variation over time cannot be ruled out.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMedical Journals Sweden ABen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe association between age and long-term quality of life after curative treatment for prostate cancer: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe association between age and long-term quality of life after curative treatment for prostate cancer: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2340/sju.v59.18616
dc.identifier.cristin2251696
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal