Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAdde, Håvard Askim
dc.contributor.authorvan Duinen, Aalke Johan
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Benetta
dc.contributor.authorBakker, Juul Marlies
dc.contributor.authorGoyah, Kezelebah
dc.contributor.authorSalvesen, Øyvind Olav
dc.contributor.authorSheriff, Swaliho
dc.contributor.authorUtam, Terseer
dc.contributor.authorYaskey, Clarence
dc.contributor.authorWeiser, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorBolkan, Håkon Angell
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T12:01:28Z
dc.date.available2024-06-13T12:01:28Z
dc.date.created2023-01-17T20:41:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Surgery. 2022, 110 (2), 169-176.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3133897
dc.description.abstractBackground: Accurate surveillance of population access to essential surgery is key for strategic healthcare planning. This study aimed to estimate population access to surgical facilities meeting standards for safe surgery equipment, specialized surgical personnel, and bellwether capability, cesarean delivery, emergency laparotomy, and long-bone fracture fixation and to evaluate the validity of using these standards to describe the full breadth of essential surgical care needs in Liberia. Method: An observational study of surgical facilities was conducted in Liberia between 20 September and 8 November 2018. Facility data were combined with geospatial data and analysed in an online visualization platform. Results: Data were collected from 51 of 52 surgical facilities. Nationally, 52.9 per cent of the population (2 392 000 of 4 525 000 people) had 2-h access to their closest surgical facility, whereas 41.1 per cent (1 858 000 people) and 48.6 per cent (2 199 000 people) had 2-h access to a facility meeting the personnel and equipment standards respectively. Six facilities performed all bellwether procedures; 38.7 per cent of the population (1 751 000 people) had 2-h access to one of these facilities. Bellwether-capable facilities were more likely to perform other essential surgical procedures (OR 3.13, 95 per cent c.i. 1.28 to 7.65; P = 0.012). These facilities delivered a median of 13.0 (i.q.r. 11.3–16.5) additional essential procedures. Conclusion: Population access to essential surgery is limited in Liberia; strategies to reduce travel times ought to be part of healthcare policy. Policymakers should also be aware that bellwether capability might not be a valid proxy for the full breadth of essential surgical care in low-income settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleMapping population access to essential surgical care in Liberia using equipment, personnel, and bellwether capability standardsen_US
dc.title.alternativeMapping population access to essential surgical care in Liberia using equipment, personnel, and bellwether capability standardsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber169-176en_US
dc.source.volume110en_US
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znac377
dc.identifier.cristin2108951
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal