Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNzasabimana, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorIgnatowicz, Agnieszka
dc.contributor.authorAlayande, Barnabas Tobi
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Latif, Abdul-Malik
dc.contributor.authorOdland, Maria Lisa
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Justine
dc.contributor.authorBekele, Abebe
dc.contributor.authorByiringiro, Jean Claude
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-16T15:12:51Z
dc.date.available2024-01-16T15:12:51Z
dc.date.created2023-11-08T09:11:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2023, 13 (9), e075117en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3111958
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Using the ‘Four Delay’ framework, our study aimed to identify and explore barriers to accessing quality injury care from the injured patients’, caregivers’ and community leaders’ perspectives. Design: A qualitative study assessing barriers to trauma care comprising 20 in-depth semistructured interviews and 4 focus group discussions was conducted. The data were analysed thematically. Setting: This qualitative study was conducted in Rwanda’s rural Burera District, located in the Northern Province, and in Kigali City, the country’s urban capital, to capture both the rural and urban population’s experiences of being injured. Participants: Purposively selected participants were individuals from urban and rural communities who had accessed injury care in the previous 6 months or cared for the injured people, and community leaders. Fifty-one participants, 13 females and 38 males ranging from 21 to 68 years of age participated in interviews and focus group discussions. Thirty-six (71%) were former trauma patients with a wide range of injuries including fractured long bones (9, 45%), other fractures, head injury, polytrauma (3, 15% each), abdominal trauma (1, 5%), and lacerations (1, 5%), while the rest were caregivers and community leaders. Results: Multiple barriers were identified cutting across all levels of the ‘Four Delays’ framework, including barriers to seeking, reaching, receiving and remaining in care. Key barriers mentioned by participants in both interviews and focus group discussions were: lack of community health insurance, limited access to ambulances, insufficient number of trauma care specialists and a high volume of trauma patients. The rigid referral process and lack of decentralised rehabilitation services were also identified as significant barriers to accessing quality care for injured patients. Conclusions: Future interventions to improve access to injury care in Rwanda must be informed by the identified barriers along the spectrum of care, from the point of injury to receipt of care and rehabilitation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBarriers to equitable access to quality trauma care in Rwanda: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeBarriers to equitable access to quality trauma care in Rwanda: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075117
dc.identifier.cristin2193645
dc.source.articlenumbere075117en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal