Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStrand, Per Sveino
dc.contributor.authorGulati, Sasha
dc.contributor.authorSagberg, Lisa Millgård
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Ole
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-26T07:15:04Z
dc.date.available2023-04-26T07:15:04Z
dc.date.created2022-08-02T15:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2772-5294
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3065044
dc.description.abstractBackground Surgical intraoperative risk factors for peritumoral infarctions are not much studied. In the present study, we explore the possible association between intraoperative factors and infarctions diagnosed from early postoperative MRIs. Methods We screened all adult patients operated for newly diagnosed or recurrent diffuse gliomas at out department from December 2015 to October 2020 with available postoperative MRI including DWI sequences. Patient data was prospectively collected in a local tumor registry. Immediately after surgery, the surgeon completed a questionnaire on tumor vascularization, tumor stiffness, delineation of tumor from normal brain tissue, which surgical tool(s) were used, and if they had sacrificed a functional artery or a significant vein. Results Data from 175 operations were included for analysis. Of these, 66 cases (38%) had postoperative peritumoral infarctions. 24 (36%) were rim-shaped and 42 (64%) infarctions were sector-shaped. The median infarction volume was 2.4 ​cm3. Surgeon reported sacrifice of a significant vein was associated with infarctions, but we found no clear “dose-response”, as “perhaps” was associated with fewer infarctions than “no”. None of the other studied factors reached statistical significance. However, there was a trend for more infarctions when an ultrasonic aspirator was used for tumor resection. Subgroup analyses were done for rim-shaped and sector-shaped infarctions, and ultrasonic aspirator was associated with sector-shaped infarctions (p ​= ​0.032). Infarction rates differed across surgeons (range 15%–67%), p ​= ​0.021). Conclusion In this single center study, no clear relationships between surgeon reported intraoperative factors and postoperative infarctions were observed. Still, risks seem to be surgeon dependent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B. V.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIntraoperative risk factors for peritumoral infarctions following glioma surgeryen_US
dc.title.alternativeIntraoperative risk factors for peritumoral infarctions following glioma surgeryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume2en_US
dc.source.journalBrain and Spineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bas.2022.100903
dc.identifier.cristin2040704
dc.source.articlenumber100903en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal