Definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Norway 2006-2015: Temporal trends, performance and survival
Fosså, Sophie Dorothea; Aas, Kirsti; Muller, Christoph Rainer; Jerm, Marianne Brenn; Tandstad, Torgrim; Lilleby, Wolfgang; Kvåle, Rune; Gulbrandsen, Johanne; Haug, Erik Skaaheim; Myklebust, Tor Åge
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version

View/ Open
Date
2020Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Abstract
Background: More studies are needed to document nation-wide use and effectiveness of curative definitive radiotherapy (Def-RT) in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa).
Patients and methods: For 38,960 men diagnosed with PCa without distant metastases from 2006 to 2015 data from the Norwegian Prostate Cancer Registry and a national radiotherapy database (NoRadBase) was analyzed. Overall survival and PCa-specific mortality were described comparing EQD-2 < 74 Gy (“low-dose”) with EQD-2 ≥ 74 Gy (“escalated dose”).
Results: Use of Def-RT decreased (27–24%) whereas the proportion of radical prostatectomies (RPs) increased (31–38%). In high-risk patients the use of RP doubled (18–36%), while the proportion of Def-RT remained stable (about 35%). Before 2010, almost a quarter of patients received low-dose Def-RT with gradual increase of escalated Def-RT thereafter. Escalated Def-RT was associated with significantly more favorable 10-year PCa-specific mortality (4.4% [95% CI: 2.7–10.7%]) than observed after low-dose Def- RT (8.8% [95% CI: 6.2–9.8%), with the most beneficial effects in high-risk patients. Our analyses indicated the need to expand the NoRadBase by consensus-based quality measures.
Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort, the overall use of Def-RT decreased slightly. In high-risk patients the provision of Def-RT remained stable and was accompanied by doubling of patients with RP and reduction of a “no curative treatment” strategy. Escalated dose Def-RT significantly reduced 10-year PCa-specific mortality compared to low-dose Def-RT. Aiming for cancer care equity national radiotherapy registries for PCa should regularly monitor data based on consensus-based quality measures enabling feedback to the responsible hospitals.