• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap (MH)
  • Institutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap (MH)
  • Institutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Subtyping of Shiga Toxin 2 Producing E. coli using Real-time PCR with HRMA

Hansen, Solveig
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
Masteroppgave (7.052Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2374518
Date
2015
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for klinisk og molekylær medisin [3824]
Abstract
Background: Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC) can produce two types of Shiga toxins (Stxs):

Stx1 and Stx2. The latter is more associated with severe disease such as haemolytic uremic syn-

drome (HUS) in humans, and is the main focus of this project. Stx2 can be categorised into several

subtypes which di er in virulence: Stx2a, Stx2b, Stx2c, Stx2d, Stx2e, Stx2g, and Stx2f, with Stx2a

and Stx2c being more virulent than other subtypes. Because of this it is desirable to be able to

di erentiate between them.

Aim: Two common methods used in Stx2 subtyping includes conventional PCR with agarose gel

electrophoresis and sequencing. As these methods are laborious and relatively expensive, the ob-

jective of this project was to nd a more e ective way of subtyping Stx2 producing E. coli.

Materials and Methods: Real-time PCR with high resolution melt analysis was chosen as a

method for Stx2 subtyping, and two di erent sets of primer pairs were tested and evaluated on

seven reference strains provided by Flemming Scheutz and Statens Serum Institut in addition to a

collection of pure and mixed culture samples containing Stx2 provided the Department of Medical

Microbiology at St. Olavs Hospital.

Results: The rst set of primer pairs could not successfully discriminate between the di erent

Stx2 subtypes. The second set showed more promise as it could di erentiate between subtypes

Stx2a, Stx2c, Stx2d, Stx2b, Stx2e, Stx2g, and determine that a sample contained Stx2a and Stx2c

or Stx2a and Stx2d when using the reference strains. Using the same set, 25 out of 29 pure culture

samples were successfully subtyped as well as 18 out of 21 mixed culture samples.

Discussion and Conclusion: There were some problems regarding primer e ciency, and some

of the tested patient samples were incorrectly subtyped or did not get ampli ed at all. Untill these

issues are resolved, the method should not be put into practice.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit