Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorUlvin, Ole Erik Eide
dc.contributor.authorSkjærseth, Eivinn Årdal
dc.contributor.authorKrüger, Andreas Jørstad
dc.contributor.authorThorsen, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorNordseth, Trond
dc.contributor.authorHaugland, Helge
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T12:29:19Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T12:29:19Z
dc.date.created2023-11-10T12:54:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2023, 13 (10), e077395-?.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3123122
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objectives Dispatching helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) to the patients with the greatest medical or logistical benefit remains challenging. The introduction of video calls (VC) in the emergency medical communication centres (EMCC) could provide additional information for EMCC operators and HEMS physicians when assessing the need for HEMS dispatch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact from VC in the EMCC on HEMS dispatch precision. Design An observational before–after study. Setting The regional EMCC and one HEMS base in Mid-Norway. Participants EMCC operators and HEMS physicians at the EMCC and HEMS base in Trondheim, Norway. Intervention In January 2022, VC became available in emergency calls in Trondheim EMCC. Data were collected from 2020 2021 (pre-intervention) and 2022 (post-intervention). Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of seriously ill or injured HEMS patients, defined as a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score between 4 and 7. The secondary outcome was the proportion of inappropriate dispatches, defined as missions with neither provision of additional competence nor any logistical contribution based on quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services. Results 811 and 402 HEMS missions with patient contact were included in the pre- and post-intervention group, respectively. The proportion of missions with NACA 4–7 was not significantly changed after the intervention (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.61, p=0.17). There was no significant change in HEMS alarm times between the pre- and post-intervention groups (7.6 min vs 6.4 min, p=0.15). The proportion of missions with neither medical nor logistical benefit was significantly lower in the post-intervention group (28.4% vs 40.3%, p=0.007). Conclusion The results from this study indicate that VC is a promising, feasible and safe tool for EMCC operators in the complex HEMS dispatch process. Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCan video communication in the emergency medical communication centre improve dispatch precision? A before-after study in Norwegian helicopter emergency medical servicesen_US
dc.title.alternativeCan video communication in the emergency medical communication centre improve dispatch precision? A before-after study in Norwegian helicopter emergency medical servicesen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumbere077395-?en_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077395
dc.identifier.cristin2195051
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal