Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGranviken, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorMeisingset, Ingebrigt
dc.contributor.authorVasseljen, Ottar
dc.contributor.authorBach, Kerstin
dc.contributor.authorBones, Anita Formo
dc.contributor.authorKlevanger, Nina Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T09:35:31Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T09:35:31Z
dc.date.created2024-01-02T09:34:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMC Med Inform Decis Mak 23, 293 (2023)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6947
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3118603
dc.description.abstractBackground We have developed a clinical decision support system (CDSS) based on methods from artificial intelligence to support physiotherapists and patients in the decision-making process of managing musculoskeletal (MSK) pain disorders in primary care. The CDSS finds the most similar successful patients from the past to give treatment recommendations for a new patient. Using previous similar patients with successful outcomes to advise treatment moves management of MSK pain patients from one-size fits all recommendations to more individually tailored treatment. This study aimed to summarise the development and explore the acceptance and use of the CDSS for MSK pain patients. Methods This qualitative study was carried out in the Norwegian physiotherapy primary healthcare sector between October and November 2020, ahead of a randomised controlled trial. We included four physiotherapists and three of their patients, in total 12 patients, with musculoskeletal pain in the neck, shoulder, back, hip, knee or complex pain. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with all participants. The interviews were analysed using the Framework Method. Results Overall, both the physiotherapists and patients found the system acceptable and usable. Important findings from the analysis of the interviews were that the CDSS was valued as a preparatory and exploratory tool, facilitating the therapeutic relationship. However, the physiotherapists used the system mainly to support their previous and current practice rather than involving patients to a greater extent in decisions and learning from previous successful patients. Conclusions The CDSS was acceptable and usable to both the patients and physiotherapists. However, the system appeared not to considerably influence the physiotherapists' clinical reasoning and choice of treatment based on information from most similar successful patients. This could be due to a smaller than optimal number of previous patients in the CDSS or insufficient clinical implementation. Extensive training of physiotherapists should not be underestimated to build understanding and trust in CDSSs.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAcceptance and use of a clinical decision support system in musculoskeletal pain disorders – the SupportPrim projecten_US
dc.title.alternativeAcceptance and use of a clinical decision support system in musculoskeletal pain disorders – the SupportPrim projecten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Makingen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12911-023-02399-7
dc.identifier.cristin2218611
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal