Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKvaavik, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorGrøtting, Maja Weemes
dc.contributor.authorHalkjelsvik, Torleif
dc.contributor.authorvan Helvoirt, Rene
dc.contributor.authorKirkhorn, Ingeborg Hjertvik
dc.contributor.authorBjaanes, Maria Moksnes
dc.contributor.authorTøndel, Hanne
dc.contributor.authorSværen, Julia Thue
dc.contributor.authorGripsgård, Helga
dc.contributor.authorByrkje, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorHelleve, Arnfinn
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T13:22:00Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T13:22:00Z
dc.date.created2023-11-27T10:08:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationActa Oncologica. 2023, 62 (12), 1890-1897en_US
dc.identifier.issn0284-186X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3115654
dc.description.abstractBackground Compared to non-smokers, smokers have reduced effects of cancer treatment, and increased risk of treatment-related toxicity. Quitting smoking can improve treatment effects and reduce side effects. This study reports on the potential impact of a smoking cessation program on smoking cessation rates among patients in cancer treatment. Material and methods Cancer patients 18 years and older who smoked, with survival prognosis ≥12 months, not suffering dementia or other mental illness, and who were referred to cancer treatment at six Norwegian hospitals were invited to participate. The study took place from 2017 to 2020 and used a pre-test-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The intervention group received structured smoking cessation guidance based on Motivational Interviewing combined with cost-free nicotine replacement products, while the control group received standard smoking cessation treatment. Self-reported smoking status were registered at baseline and at 6 months’ follow up. Results 76% of patients smoked at baseline and 44% at follow-up in the intervention group, correspondingly 72% and 49% in the control group. In an analysis of differences in within-person change, the reduction in the intervention group was 13 percentage points larger (95% CI = (0.25, −0.005), p = 0.041). Adjusting for gender, age, education, labour market participation and partnership status did not attenuate the estimated effect (18 percentage point difference, 95% CI = (−0.346, −0.016), p = 0.032). Demographic factors and dropout rate differed somewhat between the groups with a higher dropout rate in the intervention group, 54% vs. 51%, respectively). Conclusion Offering a structured smoking cessation program based on Motivational Interviewing and cost-free nicotine replacement products to cancer patients can increase cessation rates in comparison to standard smoking cessation care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe effect of a smoking cessation program for patients in cancer treatment: a quasi-experimental intervention studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe effect of a smoking cessation program for patients in cancer treatment: a quasi-experimental intervention studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.journalActa Oncologicaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/0284186X.2023.2277883
dc.identifier.cristin2202639
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal