Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDe Martin Topranin, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorEngseth, Tina Pettersen
dc.contributor.authorHrozanova, Maria
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Madison
dc.contributor.authorSandbakk, Øyvind Bucher
dc.contributor.authorNoordhof, Dionne Adriana
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-24T13:38:58Z
dc.date.available2023-11-24T13:38:58Z
dc.date.created2023-10-22T12:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP). 2023, 18 (11), 1296-1303.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3104582
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the influence of menstrual-cycle (MC) phase on measures of recovery status, that is, resting heart rate, perceived sleep quality, and physical and mental readiness to train, among female endurance athletes. Methods: Daily data were recorded during 1 to 4 MCs (ie, duration ≥21 and ≤35 d, ovulatory, luteal phase ≥10 d) of 41 trained-to-elite-level female endurance athletes (mean [SD]: age 27 [8] y, weekly training: 9 [3] h). Resting heart rate was assessed daily using a standardized protocol, while perceived sleep quality and physical and mental readiness to train were assessed using a visual analog scale (1–10). Four MC phases (early follicular phase [EFP], late follicular phase, ovulatory phase, and midluteal phase [MLP]) were determined using the calendar-based counting method and urinary ovulation-prediction test. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Resting heart rate was significantly higher in MLP (1.7 beats·min−1, P = .006) compared with EFP without significant differences between the other MC phases. Perceived sleep quality was impaired in MLP compared with late follicular phase (−0.3, P = .035). Physical readiness to train was lower both in ovulatory phase (−0.6, P = .015) and MLP (−0.5, P = .026) compared with EFP. Mental readiness to train did not show any significant differences between MC phases (P > .05). Conclusions: Although significant, the findings had negligible to small effect sizes, indicating that MC phase is likely not the main determinant of changes in measures of recovery status but, rather, one of the many possible stressors.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kineticsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe Influence of Menstrual-Cycle Phase on Measures of Recovery Status in Endurance Athletes: The Female Endurance Athlete Project.en_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Influence of Menstrual-Cycle Phase on Measures of Recovery Status in Endurance Athletes: The Female Endurance Athlete Project.en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Human Kineticsen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1296-1303en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP)en_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/ijspp.2022-0325
dc.identifier.cristin2187328
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal