Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHorne, Ingrid Marie Taxt
dc.contributor.authorVeggeland, Frode
dc.contributor.authorBååthe, Fredrik
dc.contributor.authorDrewes, Christina
dc.contributor.authorRø, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T06:21:33Z
dc.date.available2023-10-31T06:21:33Z
dc.date.created2023-04-03T13:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2023, 23 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3099535
dc.description.abstractBackground Doctors’ health is of importance for the quality and development of health care and to doctors themselves. As doctors are hesitant to seek medical treatment, peer support services, with an alleged lower threshold for seeking help, is provided in many countries. Peer support services may be the first place to which doctors turn when they search for support and advice relating to their own health and private or professional well-being. This paper explores how doctors perceive the peer support service and how it can meet their needs. Materials and methods Twelve doctors were interviewed a year after attending a peer support service which is accessible to all doctors in Norway. The qualitative, semi-structured interviews took place by on-line video meetings or over the phone (due to the COVID-19 pandemic) during 2020 and were audiotaped. Analysis was data-driven, and systematic text condensation was used as strategy for the qualitative analysis. The empirical material was further interpreted with the use of theories of organizational culture by Edgar Schein. Results The doctors sought peer support due to a range of different needs including both occupational and personal challenges. They attended peer support to engage in dialogue with a fellow doctor outside of the workplace, some were in search of a combination of dialogue and mental health care. The doctors wanted peer support to have a different quality from that of a regular doctor/patient appointment. The doctors expressed they needed and got psychological safety and an open conversation in a flexible and informal setting. Some of these qualities are related to the formal structure of the service, whereas others are based on the way the service is practised. Conclusions Peer support seems to provide psychological safety through its flexible, informal, and confidential characteristics. The service thus offers doctors in need of support a valued and suitable space that is clearly distinct from a doctor/patient relationship. The doctors’ needs are met to a high extent by the peer-support service, through such conditions that the doctors experience as beneficial.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUnderstanding peer support: a qualitative interview study of doctors one year after seeking supporten_US
dc.title.alternativeUnderstanding peer support: a qualitative interview study of doctors one year after seeking supporten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US
dc.source.volume23en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-023-09312-y
dc.identifier.cristin2139244
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal