Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWestvik-Johari, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorLawlor, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorRomundstad, Liv Bente Bergem
dc.contributor.authorBergh, Christina
dc.contributor.authorWennerholm, Ulla-Britt
dc.contributor.authorGissler, Mika
dc.contributor.authorHenningsen, Anna-Karina Aaris
dc.contributor.authorHåberg, Siri Eldevik
dc.contributor.authorTiitinen, Aila
dc.contributor.authorSpangmose, Anne Lærke
dc.contributor.authorPinborg, Anja Bisgaard
dc.contributor.authorOpdahl, Signe
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T09:49:52Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T09:49:52Z
dc.date.created2023-01-19T12:55:02Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationFertility and Sterility. 2022, 119 (2), 265-276.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0015-0282
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053094
dc.description.abstractMain Outcome Measure(s) Stillbirth (fetal death before and during delivery) and neonatal death (live born with death 0–27 days postpartum). Result(s) Overall, 17,123 (0.37%) singletons were stillborn and 7,685 (0.17%) died neonatally. Compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, the odds of stillbirth were similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET, whereas the odds of neonatal death were high after fresh-ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–1.95) and frozen-ET (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.08–2.10). Preterm birth (<37 gestational weeks) was more common after fresh-ET (8.0%) and frozen-ET (6.6%) compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance (5.0%), and strongly associated with neonatal mortality across all conception methods. Within gestational age categories, risk of stillbirth and neonatal death was similar for all conception methods, except that singletons from fresh-ET had a higher risk of stillbirth during gestational week 22–27 (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.51–2.26). Conclusion(s) Overall, the risk of stillbirth was similar after fresh-ET and frozen-ET compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance, whereas neonatal mortality was high, possibly mediated by the high risk of preterm birth when compared with singletons conceived without medical assistance. Our results gave no clear support for choosing one treatment over the other.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRisk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safetyen_US
dc.title.alternativeRisk of stillbirth and neonatal death in singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: cohort study from the Committee of Nordic Assisted Reproduction Technology and Safetyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber265-276en_US
dc.source.volume119en_US
dc.source.journalFertility and Sterilityen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.020
dc.identifier.cristin2110324
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal