Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorOdland, Maria Lisa
dc.contributor.authorGassama, Khadija
dc.contributor.authorBockarie, Tahir
dc.contributor.authorWurie, Haja
dc.contributor.authorAnsumana, Rashid
dc.contributor.authorWitham, Miles D.
dc.contributor.authorOyebode, Oyinlola
dc.contributor.authorHirschhorn, Lisa R.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Justine I.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-14T15:32:16Z
dc.date.available2023-02-14T15:32:16Z
dc.date.created2022-11-09T14:08:54Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2022, 17 (9), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050836
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Access to care for cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRFs) in low- and middle-income countries is limited. We aimed to describe the need and access to care for people with CVDRF and the preparedness of the health system to treat these in Bo, Sierra Leone. Methods Data from a 2018 household survey conducted in Bo, Sierra Leone, was analysed. Demographic, anthropometric and clinical data on CVDRF (hypertension, diabetes mellitus or dyslipidaemia) from randomly sampled individuals 40 years of age and above were collected. Future risk of CVD was calculated using the World Health Organisation–International Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) calculator with high risk defined as >20% risk over 10 years. Requirement for treatment was based on WHO package of essential non-communicable (PEN) disease guidelines (which use a risk-based approach) or requiring treatment for individual CVDRF; whether participants were on treatment was used to determine whether care needs were met. Multivariable regression was used to test associations between individual characteristics and outcomes. Data from the most recent WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) were used to create a score reflecting health system preparedness to treat CVDRF, and compared to that for HIV. Results 2071 individual participants were included. Most participants (n = 1715 [94.0%]) had low CVD risk; 423 (20.6%) and 431 (52.3%) required treatment based upon WHO PEN guidelines or individual CVDRF, respectively. Sixty-eight (15.8%) had met-need for treatment determined by WHO guidelines, whilst 84 (19.3%) for individual CVDRF. Living in urban areas, having education, being older, single/widowed/divorced, or wealthy were independently associated with met need. Overall facility readiness scores for CVD/CVDRF care for all facilities in Bo district was 16.8%, compared to 41% for HIV. Conclusion The number of people who require treatment for CVDRF in Sierra Leone is substantially lower based on WHO guidelines compared to CVDRF. CVDRF care needs are not met equitably, and facility readiness to provide care is low.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCardiovascular disease risk profile and management among people 40 years of age and above in Bo, Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeCardiovascular disease risk profile and management among people 40 years of age and above in Bo, Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0274242
dc.identifier.cristin2071294
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal