Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorØen, Silje Kjærnes
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Knut
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Lars Kjelsberg
dc.contributor.authorBerntsen, Erik Magnus
dc.contributor.authorTotland, Jon Andre
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Håkon
dc.contributor.authorBogsrud, Trond Velde
dc.contributor.authorSolheim, Tora S
dc.contributor.authorKarlberg, Anna Maria
dc.contributor.authorEikenes, Live
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-16T12:19:14Z
dc.date.available2023-01-16T12:19:14Z
dc.date.created2022-12-02T09:51:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationClinical Nuclear Medicine. 2022, 47 (12), 1030-1039.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0363-9762
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3043713
dc.description.abstractPurpose The study aims to evaluate whether combined 18F-FACBC PET/MRI could provide additional diagnostic information compared with MRI alone in brain metastases. Patients and Methods Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed or suspected recurrence of brain metastases received dynamic 18F-FACBC PET/MRI. Lesion detection was evaluated on PET and MRI scans in 2 groups depending on prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS group) or not (no-SRS group). SUVs, time-activity curves, and volumetric analyses of the lesions were performed. Results In the no-SRS group, 29/29 brain lesions were defined as “MRI positive.” With PET, 19/29 lesions were detected and had high tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) (Dmax MR, ≥7 mm; SUVmax, 1.2–8.4; TBR, 3.9–25.9), whereas 10/29 lesions were undetected (Dmax MR, ≤8 mm; SUVmax, 0.3–1.2; TBR, 1.0–2.7). In the SRS group, 4/6 lesions were defined as “MRI positive,” whereas 2/6 lesions were defined as “MRI negative” indicative of radiation necrosis. All 6 lesions were detected with PET (Dmax MR, ≥15 mm; SUVmax, 1.4–4.2; TBR, 3.6–12.6). PET volumes correlated and were comparable in size with contrast-enhanced MRI volumes but were only partially congruent (mean DSC, 0.66). All time-activity curves had an early peak, followed by a plateau or a decreasing slope. Conclusions 18F-FACBC PET demonstrated uptake in brain metastases from cancer of different origins (lung, gastrointestinal tract, breast, thyroid, and malignant melanoma). However, 18F-FACBC PET/MRI did not improve detection of brain metastases compared with MRI but might detect tumor tissue beyond contrast enhancement on MRI. 18F-FACBC PET should be further evaluated in recurrent brain metastases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-Ingen bearbeidelser 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no
dc.titleDiagnostic Value of 18F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastasesen_US
dc.title.alternativeDiagnostic Value of <sup>18</sup>F-FACBC PET/MRI in Brain Metastasesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1030-1039en_US
dc.source.volume47en_US
dc.source.journalClinical Nuclear Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/RLU.0000000000004435
dc.identifier.cristin2087588
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-Ingen bearbeidelser 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-IkkeKommersiell-Ingen bearbeidelser 4.0 Internasjonal