Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHolen Gravås, Else Marit
dc.contributor.authorØsterås, Nina
dc.contributor.authorNossum, Randi
dc.contributor.authorEide, Ruth Else Meh
dc.contributor.authorKlokkeide, Åse
dc.contributor.authorMatre, Karin
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Monika
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Øyvor
dc.contributor.authorBos-Haugen, Ida Kristin
dc.contributor.authorTveter, Anne Therese
dc.contributor.authorKjeken, Ingvild
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T14:42:00Z
dc.date.available2023-01-05T14:42:00Z
dc.date.created2019-12-18T15:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationRMD Open. 2019, 5:001046 (2), 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2056-5933
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041350
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate whether occupational therapy, provided in the period between referral and surgical consultation, might delay or reduce the need of surgery in thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) osteoarthritis and to explore predictors for CMCJ surgery. Methods: This multicentre randomised controlled trial included patients referred for surgical consultation due to CMCJ osteoarthritis. An occupational therapy group received hand osteoarthritis education, assistive devices, CMCJ orthoses and exercises. A control group received only hand osteoarthritis information. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients that had received CMCJ surgery after 2 years. We examined the primary outcome and predictors for surgery with regression models, and time to surgery with the log-rank test and cox regression analyses. Results: Of 221 patients screened for eligibility, 180 were randomised. Information on the primary outcome was collected from medical records for all included patients. Surgery was performed on 22 patients (24%) that had received occupational therapy and 29 (32%) control patients (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.21; p=0.14). Median time to surgery was 350 days (IQR 210–540) in the occupational therapy group and 296 days (IQR 188–428) in the control group (p=0.13). Previous non-pharmacological treatment (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.14 to 6.50) and higher motivation for surgery (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.43) were significant predictors for CMCJ surgery. Conclusions: Occupational therapy showed a small non-significant tendency to delay and reduce the need for surgery in CMCJ osteoarthritis. Previous non-pharmacological treatment and higher motivation for surgery were significant predictors for surgery.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleDoes occupational therapy delay or reduce the proportion of patients that receives thumb carpometacarpal joint surgery? A multicentre randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-8en_US
dc.source.volume5:001046en_US
dc.source.journalRMD Openen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001046
dc.identifier.cristin1762649
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal