Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorØberg, Gunn Kristin
dc.contributor.authorGirolami, Gay L
dc.contributor.authorCampell, Suzann K.
dc.contributor.authorUstad, Tordis
dc.contributor.authorHeuch, Ivar
dc.contributor.authorJacobsen, Bjarne K.
dc.contributor.authorKaaresen, Per Ivar
dc.contributor.authorAulie, Vibeke Smith
dc.contributor.authorJørgensen, Lone
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T14:46:17Z
dc.date.available2022-11-29T14:46:17Z
dc.date.created2020-09-30T10:12:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPhysical Therapy. 2020, 100 (5), 860-869.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031-9023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3034814
dc.description.abstractBackground - Despite the risk of delayed motor development in infants born preterm, knowledge about interventions in the neonatal intensive care unitt (NICU) and the effects of dosing is sparse. Objective - The objectives of this study were to examine the effectiveness of a parent-administered exercise program in the NICU on motor outcome at 3 months corrected age (CA) and the effect of dosing on motor performance. Design - This was a randomized clinical trial. Setting The study was conducted at 3 university hospitals in Tromsø, Trondheim, and Oslo, Norway. Participants - A total of 153 infants with gestational age <32 weeks at birth were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Intervention - A 3-week parent-administered intervention designed to facilitate movements in preterm infants was performed in the NICU. Parents were asked to administer the intervention 10 minutes twice a day. Measurements - Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) was used to assess short-term outcome at 3 months CA. Results - No significant difference in the TIMP z-score was found between intervention and control groups at follow-up 3 months CA, but a significant positive relationship was found between total intervention dose and TIMP z-scores. The adjusted odds of having a clinical z-score < 0 at 3 months CA was about 6 times higher for infants with less than median intervention time than for infants with a longer intervention time. Limitations - The number of infants born before 28 weeks was small. A spillover effect in favor of the control group was possible. We do not know if the infants received physical therapy after discharge from the hospital. Conclusions - There was no difference in motor performance between the intervention group and the control group at 3 months CA. However, an increased intervention dose was positively associated with improved motor outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Therapy Association (APTA); Oxford University Pressen_US
dc.titleEffects of a parent-administered exercise program in the neonatal intensive care unit: Dose does matter-a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2020 American Physical Therapy Association. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Physical Therapy following peer review. The version of record Øberg gk, Girolami GL, Campell, Ustad T, Heuch I, Jacobsen bk, Kaaresen pi, Aulie VS, Jørgensen l. Effects of a parent-administered exercise program in the neonatal intensive care unit: Dose does matter-a randomized controlled trial . Physical Therapy. 2020;100(5):860-869 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa014.en_US
dc.source.pagenumber860-869en_US
dc.source.volume100en_US
dc.source.journalPhysical Therapyen_US
dc.source.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ptj/pzaa014
dc.identifier.cristin1835302
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel