Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Pavel
dc.contributor.authorAl-Ani, Ahmed Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorvon Lueder, Thomas Gero
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorMajak, Peter
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Ove Andreas
dc.contributor.authorLoose, Helga
dc.contributor.authorKløw, Nils-Einar
dc.contributor.authorOpdahl, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-05T08:51:38Z
dc.date.available2022-07-05T08:51:38Z
dc.date.created2019-02-21T10:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2520-8934
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3002705
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite decreasing sheath diameter, access site bleeding and vascular complications are still a major concern in transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and may increase morbidity and even increase mortality. The aim was to compare safety of arterial closure in transfemoral TAVI with two different principles, pre-suture with ProGlide and collagen plug closure with Manta. Results: Seventy-six patients treated with ProGlide and 75 with Manta were analysed. The endpoints were 1: access site vascular complications and 2: non-planned vascular or endovascular surgery at the puncture site. Complications occurred in 2 (2.7%) ProGlide and in 8 (10.7%) Manta cases, p = 0.047. During the learning phase there were no significant differences. In the established phase there was one event (2%) in the ProGlide group, compared to 6 endpoints (12.0%), p = 0.047, in the Manta group. Unplanned surgery or intervention was seen in two (2.7%) ProGlide and in 7 (9.3%) Manta patients, p = ns. There were no significant differences during the learning phase. In established use, endpoints occurred more frequently in patients treated with the Manta device (12%), than in patients treated with the ProGlide (2%), p = 0.047. Conclusion: The ProGlide presuture closure device was associated with significantly lower rates of vascular complications and lower rates of surgery and interventions compared to the collagen plug Manta system.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Openen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAccess site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation - a comparison of Manta and ProGlideen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume1en_US
dc.source.journalCVIR Endovascularen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42155-018-0026-0
dc.identifier.cristin1679444
cristin.unitcode1920,6,0,0
cristin.unitnameKlinikk for hjertemedisin
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal