Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorvan Duinen, Aalke Johan
dc.contributor.authorWestendorp, Josien
dc.contributor.authorAshley, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorHagander, Lars
dc.contributor.authorHolmer, Hampus
dc.contributor.authorKoroma, Alimamy P.
dc.contributor.authorLeather, Andy J.M.
dc.contributor.authorShrime, Mark G.
dc.contributor.authorWibe, Arne
dc.contributor.authorBolkan, Håkon Angell
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-04T12:55:49Z
dc.date.available2021-11-04T12:55:49Z
dc.date.created2021-10-29T16:19:26Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2021, 16 (10), 1-14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2827915
dc.description.abstractBackground Utilizing surgical services, including caesarean sections, can result in catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment. In 2010, Sierra Leone introduced the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI), a national financial risk protection program for the most vulnerable groups. Aim of this study was to investigate catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment related to caesarean section in Sierra Leone and evaluate the impact of the FHCI. Methods Women who delivered by caesarean section in nine hospitals were followed up with home visits one month after surgery, and data on medical and non-medical expenditures were collected. Individual income was estimated based on household characteristics and used to determine catastrophic expenditure and impoverishment for each patient. The impact of the FHCI was assessed by comparing actual expenditure with counterfactual expenditures had the initiative not existed. Results For the 1146 patients in the study, the median expenditure was 23 (IQR 4; 56) international dollars (Int$). Patients in the poorest quintile spent a median Int$ 59 (IQR 28; 76), which was significantly more than patients in the richest quintile, who spent a median Int$ 17 (IQR 2; 38, p<0.001). Travel (32.9%) and food (28.7%) were the two largest expenses. Catastrophic expenditure was encountered by 12.0% and 4.0% (10% and 25% threshold, respectively) of the women. Without the FHCI, 66.1% and 28.8% of the women would have encountered catastrophic expenditure. Conclusion Many women in Sierra Leone face catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, mainly through food and travel expenses, and the poor are disproportionally affected. The FHCI is effective in reducing the risk of catastrophic expenditure related to caesarean section, but many patients are still exposed to financial hardship, suggesting that additional support is needed for Sierra Leone’s poorest patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCatastrophic expenditure and impoverishment after caesarean section in Sierra Leone: An evaluation of the free health care initiativeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-14en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0258532
dc.identifier.cristin1949756
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal