Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLønvik, Maja Pålsdatter
dc.contributor.authorElden, Odd Erik
dc.contributor.authorLunde, Mats Joakimsen
dc.contributor.authorNordseth, Trond
dc.contributor.authorBakkelund, Karin Elvenes
dc.contributor.authorUleberg, Oddvar
dc.identifier.citationBMC Emergency Medicine. 2021, 21 .en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Airway management in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important and several methods are used. The establishment of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is a common technique used during OHCA. Two types of SAD are routinely used in Norway; the Kings LTS-D™ and the I-gel®. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of these two devices in terms of difficulty, number of attempts before successful insertion and overall success rate of insertion. Methods: All adult patients with OHCA, in whom ambulance personnel used a SAD over a one-year period in the ambulance services of Central Norway, were included. After the event, a questionnaire was completed and the personnel responsible for the airway management were interviewed. Primary outcomes were number of attempts until successful insertion, by either same or different ambulance personnel, and the difficulty of insertion graded by easy, medium or hard. Secondary outcomes were reported complications with inserting the SAD’s. Results: Two hundred and fifty patients were included, of whom 191 received I-gel and 59 received LTS-D. Overall success rate was significantly higher in I-gel (86%) compared to LTS-D (75%, p = 0.043). The rates of successful placements were higher when using I-gel compared to LTS-D, and there was a significant increased risk that the insertion of the LTS-D was unsuccessful compared to the I-gel (risk ratio 1.8, p = 0.04). I-gel was assessed to be easy to insert in 80% of the patients, as opposed to LTS-D which was easy to insert in 51% of the patients. Conclusions: Overall success rate was significantly higher and the difficulty in insertion was significantly lower in the I-gel group compared to the LTS-D in patients with OHCA.lasten_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.titleA prospective observational study comparing two supraglottic airway devices in out-of-hospital cardiac arresten_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.source.journalBMC Emergency Medicineen_US

Tilhørende fil(er)


Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal