Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKaandorp, Misha Pieter Thijs
dc.contributor.authorBarbieri, Sebastiano
dc.contributor.authorKlaassen, Remy
dc.contributor.authorvan Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M.
dc.contributor.authorCrezee, Hans
dc.contributor.authorWhile, Peter Thomas
dc.contributor.authorNederveen, Aart J.
dc.contributor.authorGurney-Champion, Oliver J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T09:28:48Z
dc.date.available2021-10-04T09:28:48Z
dc.date.created2021-09-29T12:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationMagnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2021, 86, 2250-2265.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0740-3194
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2787414
dc.description.abstractPurpose Earlier work showed that IVIM-NETorig, an unsupervised physics-informed deep neural network, was faster and more accurate than other state-of-the-art intravoxel-incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting approaches to diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This study presents a substantially improved version, IVIM-NEToptim, and characterizes its superior performance in pancreatic cancer patients. Method In simulations (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR] = 20), the accuracy, independence, and consistency of IVIM-NET were evaluated for combinations of hyperparameters (fit S0, constraints, network architecture, number of hidden layers, dropout, batch normalization, learning rate), by calculating the normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE), Spearman’s ρ, and the coefficient of variation (CVNET), respectively. The best performing network, IVIM-NEToptim was compared to least squares (LS) and a Bayesian approach at different SNRs. IVIM-NEToptim’s performance was evaluated in an independent dataset of 23 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Fourteen of the patients received no treatment between two repeated scan sessions and nine received chemoradiotherapy between the repeated sessions. Intersession within-subject standard deviations (wSD) and treatment-induced changes were assessed. Results In simulations (SNR = 20), IVIM-NEToptim outperformed IVIM-NETorig in accuracy (NRMSE(D) = 0.177 vs 0.196; NMRSE(f) = 0.220 vs 0.267; NMRSE(D*) = 0.386 vs 0.393), independence (ρ(D*, f) = 0.22 vs 0.74), and consistency (CVNET(D) = 0.013 vs 0.104; CVNET(f) = 0.020 vs 0.054; CVNET(D*) = 0.036 vs 0.110). IVIM-NEToptim showed superior performance to the LS and Bayesian approaches at SNRs < 50. In vivo, IVIM-NEToptim showed significantly less noisy parameter maps with lower wSD for D and f than the alternatives. In the treated cohort, IVIM-NEToptim detected the most individual patients with significant parameter changes compared to day-to-day variations. Conclusion IVIM-NEToptim is recommended for accurate, informative, and consistent IVIM fitting to DWI data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicineen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/mrm.28852
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleImproved unsupervised physics-informed deep learning for intravoxel incoherent motion modeling and evaluation in pancreatic cancer patientsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber2250-2265en_US
dc.source.volume86en_US
dc.source.journalMagnetic Resonance in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mrm.28852
dc.identifier.cristin1940500
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 302624en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal