Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBlindheim, Augun
dc.contributor.authorFosså, Sophie Dorothea
dc.contributor.authorBabigumira, Ronnie
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Bettina Kulle
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T12:52:37Z
dc.date.available2021-09-28T12:52:37Z
dc.date.created2021-06-09T21:20:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Urology. 2021, 1-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-1805
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2784135
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the use of repeat transurethral resection of the bladder (reTURB) in stage T1 bladdercancer and its impact on treatment and survival in a Norwegian population-based cohort. Material and methods: 1130 patients registered at the cancer Registry of Norway between 2008 and2012 with primary urothelial T1 cancer were included. Information on surgical and medical procedures was provided by the Norwegian Patient Registry. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate characteristics of patients receiving reTURB or not within 12 weeks from primary TURB (primTURB). Survival models identified risk factors and estimated cause-specific survival rates (CSS) adjusted for sex, age, WHO grade, concomitant cis and detrusor muscle at primTURB and treatment. Results: The 648 (57%) T1 patients with reTURB were significantly younger and had more WHO high grade tumors compared to those without reTURB. Of 275 patients without detrusor muscle at primTURB 114 (41%) had no reTURB. Of reTURB patients, 45 (7%) had muscle invasive tumor, 110 (17%) T1 and 378 (58%) Ta, cis or T0. Two-thirds of 81 patients receiving early cystectomy after reTURB had T1 or muscle invasive bladder cancer at reTURB. ReTURB did not impact adjusted CSS, but patients with T1 at reTURB had significantly lower CSS than those with < T1 conditions. Conclusions: Almost half of the T1 patients did not undergo reTURB as recommended in guidelines. We show that reTURB makes the histology result more reliable with impact on both treatment and survival. Our results support the use of reTURB as recommended by EAU guidelines.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe use of reTURB in T1 bladder cancer: a Norwegian population-based studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-8en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21681805.2021.1917652
dc.identifier.cristin1914938
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal