Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGrangeon, Lou
dc.contributor.authorOConnor, Emer
dc.contributor.authorDanno, Daisuke
dc.contributor.authorNgoc, Thanh Mai Pham
dc.contributor.authorCheema, Sanjay
dc.contributor.authorTronvik, Erling Andreas
dc.contributor.authorDavagnanam, Indran
dc.contributor.authorMatharu, Manjit
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T11:44:25Z
dc.date.available2021-04-14T11:44:25Z
dc.date.created2021-04-06T14:49:31Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationCephalalgia. 2021, 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0333-1024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2737735
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine the prevalence and clinical predictors of pituitary adenomas in cluster headache patients, in order to determine the necessity of performing dedicated pituitary magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cluster headache. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of all consecutive patients diagnosed with cluster headache and with available brain magnetic resonance imaging between 2007 and 2017 in a tertiary headache center. Data including demographics, attack characteristics, response to treatments, results of neuroimaging, and routine pituitary function tests were recorded. Results Seven hundred and eighteen cluster headache patients attended the headache clinic; 643 underwent a standard magnetic resonance imaging scan, of whom 376 also underwent dedicated pituitary magnetic resonance imaging. Pituitary adenomas occurred in 17 of 376 patients (4.52%). Non-functioning microadenomas (n = 14) were the most common abnormality reported. Two patients, one of whom lacked the symptoms of pituitary disease, required treatment for their pituitary lesion. No clinical predictors of those adenomas were identified after multivariate analysis using random forests. Systematic pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scanning did not benefit even a single patient in the entire cohort. Conclusion The prevalence of pituitary adenomas in cluster headache is similar to that reported in the general population, thereby precluding an over-representation of pituitary lesions in cluster headache. We conclude that the diagnostic assessment of cluster headache patients should not include specific pituitary screening. Only patients with standard brain magnetic resonance imaging findings or symptoms suggestive of a pituitary disorder require brain magnetic resonance imaging with dedicated pituitary views.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGEen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIs pituitary MRI screening necessary in cluster headache?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.journalCephalalgiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0333102420983303
dc.identifier.cristin1902453
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal