Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVåpenstad, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorHofstad, Erlend Fagertun
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, Tor Eivind
dc.contributor.authorAadahl, Petter
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Gjermund
dc.contributor.authorMårvik, Ronald
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T13:56:58Z
dc.date.available2021-03-25T13:56:58Z
dc.date.created2019-06-18T13:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationMITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies. 2019, 29 (3), 161-169.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-5706
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2735566
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Box trainers with motion analysis are important add-ons to surgical training and skills assessment outside the operating room, given that they exhibit construct validity. Material and methods: Four different tasks were tested for construct validity on a new laparoscopic box trainer with integrated motion analysis. Tracking data from the simulator were analyzed for eighteen parameters per task using an in-house software comparing participants with three different experience levels. Results: In total, ten novices, 22 intermediates and 16 experts enrolled. No or limited significant differences were found for the peg picker and rope race. For the precision cutting task 12 parameters showed significant difference between novices and intermediates, 14 between novices and experts and one between intermediates and experts. For the suture task the corresponding results were one, 15 and six. Conclusions: The precision cutting and suture task both showed construct validity for many of the parameters. While the precision cutting task distinguished best between novices and the other two groups, the suture task distinguished best between experts and the other two groups. These results show the importance of the timing of an assessment task, and that an assessment task might have limited value if experience levels are not considered.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectKirurgien_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectSimulatortreningen_US
dc.subjectSimulator trainingen_US
dc.titleOptimal timing of assessment tasks depending on experience level of surgical traineesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber161-169en_US
dc.source.volume29en_US
dc.source.journalMITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologiesen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13645706.2019.1612441
dc.identifier.cristin1705685
dc.relation.projectSamarbeidsorganet mellom Helse Midt-Norge og NTNU: 46056723en_US
dc.description.localcodeThis is an [Accepted Manuscript] of an article published by Taylor & Francis, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1612441en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel