dc.contributor.author | Mansoor, Saira Mauland | |
dc.contributor.author | Våpenstad, Cecilie | |
dc.contributor.author | Mårvik, Ronald | |
dc.contributor.author | Glomsaker, Tom Birger | |
dc.contributor.author | Bliksøen, Marte | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-22T09:15:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-22T09:15:11Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-09-15T23:49:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | MITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies. 2019, 29 (5), 261-268. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1364-5706 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2734697 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To examine the construct validity of the low-cost, portable laparoscopic simulator eoSim using motion analysis.
Material and methods: Novice and experienced surgeons (≤ 100 and >100 laparoscopic procedures performed, respectively) completed four tasks on the eoSim using the SurgTrac software: intracorporeal suture and tie, tube ligation, peg capping and precision cutting. The following metrics were recorded: Time to complete task, distance traveled, handedness (left- versus right hand use), time off-screen, distance between instrument tips, speed, acceleration and motion smoothness.
Results: Compared to novices (n = 22), experienced surgeons (n = 14) completed tasks in less time (p ≤ .025), except when performing peg capping (p = .052). On all tasks, they also scored lower on the distance metric (p ≤ .001). Differences in handedness (left hand compared between groups, right hand compared between groups) were found to be significant for three tasks (p ≤ .025). In general, the experienced group made greater use of their left hand than the novice group.
Conclusion: The eoSim can differentiate between experienced and novice surgeons on the tasks intracorporeal suture and tie, tube ligation and precision cutting, thus providing a convenient method for surgical departments to implement testing of their surgeons’ basic laparoscopic skills. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | virtuell realitet | en_US |
dc.subject | virtual reality | en_US |
dc.subject | Kirurgi | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Simulatortrening | en_US |
dc.subject | Simulator training | en_US |
dc.title | Construct validity of eoSim - a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | acceptedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 261-268 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | MITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13645706.2019.1638411 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1724860 | |
dc.description.localcode | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1638411 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | postprint | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |