Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLian, Ingrid Alsos
dc.contributor.authorÅsberg, Arne
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T13:07:47Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17T13:07:47Z
dc.date.created2018-12-06T09:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2018, 8 (8), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2728695
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Albumin-adjusted total calcium is often used as a surrogate marker for free calcium to evaluate hypocalcaemia or hypercalcaemia. Many adjustment formulas based on simple linear regression models have been published, and continue to be used in spite of questionable diagnostic accuracy. In the hope of finding a more pure albumin effect on total calcium, we used multiple linear regression models to adjust for other relevant variables. The regression coefficients of albumin were used to construct local adjustment formulas, and we tested whether the diagnostic accuracy was improved compared with previously published formulas and unadjusted calcium. Design: A retrospective hospital laboratory data study. Data sources: The local hospital laboratory data system. Setting: Norway, 2006–2015. Participants: 6549 patients above 2 years of age, where free calcium standardised at pH 7.40, total calcium, creatinine, albumin and phosphate had been analysed in a single blood draw, including hospitalised patients and patients from outpatient clinics and general practice. Main outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy by Harrell’s c and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, using free calcium standardised at pH 7.40 as a gold standard, in subgroups with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 or <60mL/min/1.73m2. Results: In the subgroup with eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m2, the Harrell’s c of unadjusted total calcium (0.801) was significantly larger than those of the local formulas (0.790, p=0.002) and the best formula taken from literature (0.791, p=0.004). In the subgroup with eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73m2, no significant differences were found between these three formulas. Conclusions: Our study shows that the diagnostic accuracy of unadjusted total calcium is superior to several commonly used adjustment formulas, and we suggest that the use of such formulas should be abandoned in clinical practice. If the clinician does not trust total calcium to reflect the calcium status of the patient, free calcium should be measured.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleShould total calcium be adjusted for albumin? A retrospective observational study of laboratory data from central Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber7en_US
dc.source.volume8en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017703
dc.identifier.cristin1639745
dc.description.localcodeThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.description.localcode© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.en_US
cristin.unitcode1920,14,0,0
cristin.unitnameLaboratoriemedisinsk klinikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal