Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Camilla J.
dc.contributor.authorGurd, Brendon J.
dc.contributor.authorBonafiglia, Jacob T.
dc.contributor.authorVoisin, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zhixiu
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorCroci, Ilaria
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Jenna L
dc.contributor.authorGajanand, Trishan
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Joyce S.
dc.contributor.authorFassett, Robert G.
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Jonathan P.
dc.contributor.authorFrancois, Monique E.
dc.contributor.authorHearon, Christopher M.
dc.contributor.authorSarma, Satyam
dc.contributor.authorJanssen, Sylvan L.J.E.
dc.contributor.authorVan Craenenbroeck, Emeline M.
dc.contributor.authorBeckers, Paul
dc.contributor.authorCornelissen, Véronique A.
dc.contributor.authorPattyn, Nele
dc.contributor.authorHowden, Erin J.
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Shelley E.
dc.contributor.authorBye, Anja
dc.contributor.authorStensvold, Dorthe
dc.contributor.authorWisløff, Ulrik
dc.contributor.authorPapadimitriou, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorYan, Xu
dc.contributor.authorBishop, David J.
dc.contributor.authorEynon, Nir
dc.contributor.authorCoombes, Jeff S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-13T09:39:52Z
dc.date.available2020-02-13T09:39:52Z
dc.date.created2019-09-16T12:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology. 2019, 10:19 1-13.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2641481
dc.description.abstractThere is heterogeneity in the observed www.frontiersin.orgO2peak response to similar exercise training, and different exercise approaches produce variable degrees of exercise response (trainability). The aim of this study was to combine data from different laboratories to compare www.frontiersin.orgO2peak trainability between various volumes of interval training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). For interval training, volumes were classified by the duration of total interval time. High-volume High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) included studies that had participants complete more than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. Low-volume HIIT/Sprint Interval Training (SIT) included studies using less than 15 min of high intensity efforts per session. In total, 677 participants across 18 aerobic exercise training interventions from eight different universities in five countries were included in the analysis. Participants had completed 3 weeks or more of either high-volume HIIT (n = 299), low-volume HIIT/SIT (n = 116), or MICT (n = 262) and were predominately men (n = 495) with a mix of healthy, elderly and clinical populations. Each training intervention improved mean www.frontiersin.orgO2peak at the group level (P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume HIIT had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) absolute www.frontiersin.orgO2peak increase (0.29 L/min) compared to MICT (0.20 L/min) and low-volume HIIT/SIT (0.18 L/min). Adjusted relative www.frontiersin.orgO2peak increase was also significantly greater (P < 0.01) in high-volume HIIT (3.3 ml/kg/min) than MICT (2.4 ml/kg/min) and insignificantly greater (P = 0.09) than low-volume HIIT/SIT (2.5 mL/kg/min). Based on a high threshold for a likely response (technical error of measurement plus the minimal clinically important difference), high-volume HIIT had significantly more (P < 0.01) likely responders (31%) compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT (16%) and MICT (21%). Covariates such as age, sex, the individual study, population group, sessions per week, study duration and the average between pre and post www.frontiersin.orgO2peak explained only 17.3% of the variance in www.frontiersin.orgO2peak trainability. In conclusion, high-volume HIIT had more likely responders to improvements in www.frontiersin.orgO2peak compared to low-volume HIIT/SIT and MICT.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFrontiers Medianb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA multi-center comparison of vO2peak trainability between interval training and moderate intensity continuous trainingnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber1-13nb_NO
dc.source.volume10:19nb_NO
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Physiologynb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2019.00019
dc.identifier.cristin1725054
dc.description.localcode© 2019 Williams, Gurd, Bonafiglia, Voisin, Li, Harvey, Croci, Taylor, Gajanand, Ramos, Fassett, Little, Francois, Hearon, Sarma, Janssen, Van Craenenbroeck, Beckers, Cornelissen, Pattyn, Howden, Keating, Bye, Stensvold, Wisloff, Papadimitriou, Yan, Bishop, Eynon and Coombes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,25,0
cristin.unitcode1920,26,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk
cristin.unitnameSentral stab
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal