Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAstrid Bjørke, Jenssen
dc.contributor.authorStovner, Lars Jacob
dc.contributor.authorTronvik, Erling Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSand, Trond
dc.contributor.authorHelde, Grethe
dc.contributor.authorGravdahl, Gøril Bruvik
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Knut
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T14:24:48Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T14:24:48Z
dc.date.created2020-01-06T11:29:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1129-2369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2638147
dc.description.abstractAims To evaluate the crossover design in migraine preventive treatment trials by assessing dropout rate, and potential period and carryover effect in four placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods In order to increase statistical power, the study combined data from four different RCTs performed from 1998 to 2015 at St. Olavs Hospital, Norway. Among 264 randomized patients, 120 received placebo treatment before and 144 after active treatment. Results Only 26 (10%) dropped out during the follow-up period of 30–48 weeks, the majority (n = 19) in the first 12 weeks. No period effect was found, since the treatment sequence did not influence the responder rate after placebo treatment, being respectively for migraine 30.5% vs. 27.4% (p = 0.59) and for headache 25.0% vs. 24.8% (p = 0.97, Chi-square test) when placebo occurred early or late. Furthermore, no carryover effect was identified, since the treatment sequence did not influence the treatment effect (difference between placebo and active treatment). There was no significant difference between those who received active treatment first and those who received placebo first with respect to change in number of days per 4 week of headache (− 0.9 vs. -1.3, p = 0.46) and migraine (− 1.2 vs. -0.9, p = 0.35, Student’s t-test). Conclusions Summary data from four crossover trials evaluating preventive treatment in adult migraine showed that few dropped out after the first period. No period or carryover effect was found. RCT studies with crossover design can be recommended as an efficient and cost-saving way to evaluate potential new preventive medicines for migraine in adults.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBMC (part of Springer Nature)nb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThe crossover design for migraine preventives: an analyses of four randomized placebo-controlled trialsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.journalThe Journal of Headache and Painnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s10194-019-1067-z
dc.identifier.cristin1766704
dc.description.localcode© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,65,30,0
cristin.unitcode1920,16,1,0
cristin.unitcode1920,16,0,0
cristin.unitcode1920,26,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for nevromedisin og bevegelsesvitenskap
cristin.unitnameNasjonal kompetansetjeneste for hodepine
cristin.unitnameNevroklinikken
cristin.unitnameSentral stab
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal