Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlemets, Jonatan Ralf Axel
dc.contributor.authorHovd, Morten
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-20T09:00:16Z
dc.date.available2020-01-20T09:00:16Z
dc.date.created2019-04-30T13:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Process Control. 2019, 76 15-26.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0959-1524
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2636927
dc.description.abstractSelf-optimizing control focuses on minimizing the steady-state loss for processes in the presence of disturbances by holding selected controlled variables at constant set-points. The loss can further be reduced by controlling linear measurement combinations that have been obtained with the purpose of minimizing either the worst-case loss or the average loss. Since self-optimizing control mainly focuses on the steady-state operation, little emphasis has been put on the dynamic behaviour of the resulting closed-loop system. The general approach is to first compute the optimal controlled variables and then design their respective controllers. However, the optimal measurement combinations, can often (especially if many measurements are used) result in very dynamically complex systems, that makes designing the feedback controllers difficult. In this work, PI controllers and measurement combinations are simultaneously obtained with the aim to find an optimal trade-off between minimizing the steady-state loss and the transient response for the resulting closed-loop system. A solution can be found by solving a bilinear matrix inequality (BMI), which becomes a linear matrix inequality (LMI) by specifying a stabilizing state feedback gain. The optimization problem can also be combined with the sparsity promoting weighted l1-norm, which penalizes the number measurements used and thus, attempts to find an optimal measurement subset. The proposed method requires solving a BMI, for which an iterative LMI approach can be used to find a local optimum, which often seems to give good results, as illustrated on two case studies, consisting of a binary and a Kaibel distillation column.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElseviernb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleAccounting for dynamics in self-optimizing controlnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber15-26nb_NO
dc.source.volume76nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Process Controlnb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.01.003
dc.identifier.cristin1694778
dc.description.localcode© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).nb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,63,25,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for teknisk kybernetikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal