• norsk
    • English
  • norsk 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Logg inn
Vis innførsel 
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
  •   Hjem
  • Øvrige samlinger
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU
  • Vis innførsel
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of Current Control Strategies in Modular Multilevel Converter

Wei, Jianzhao; Acharya, Anirudh Budnar; Norum, Lars Einar; Bauer, Pavol
Chapter
Accepted version
Thumbnail
Åpne
Wei (1.922Mb)
Permanent lenke
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2595062
Utgivelsesdato
2018
Metadata
Vis full innførsel
Samlinger
  • Institutt for elkraftteknikk [1559]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [19849]
Originalversjon
10.23919/IPEC.2018.8507612
Sammendrag
There is a need to transmit the power generated from windfarm in remote locations to the residential and industrial load. One of the suitable and economic solution for such long distance transmission of power is the High Voltage DC (HVDC) transmission. The Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) based HVDC transmission is a proven technology with very high power quality. A multi-objective control is used to control the MMC, one of the objectives is to deliver the power from windfarm to grid, the other objective of the control is to achieve stable operation of the MMC. In order to achieve a stable operation, the capacitors in the MMC should be balanced and the currents circulating within the phases of the MMC need to be controlled. Many control strategies have been proposed to suppress such Circulating Current (CC). However, there is no clear comparison between these control strategies. In this paper control strategies for the MMC are reviewed specifically the circulating current suppressor. The cascaded control based on PI-controller and the Model Predictive Control (MPC) for outer current control are compared. Results show that traditional method has better steady state performance, while MPC based method has much faster dynamic response and has the advantage of involving less control loops in controlling systems with multiple control aspects. The control methods for capacitor voltage balancing and the circulating current suppression are simulated and compared.
Utgiver
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit
 

 

Bla i

Hele arkivetDelarkiv og samlingerUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifterDenne samlingenUtgivelsesdatoForfattereTitlerEmneordDokumenttyperTidsskrifter

Min side

Logg inn

Statistikk

Besøksstatistikk

Kontakt oss | Gi tilbakemelding

Personvernerklæring
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Levert av  Unit