Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Erlend Liavåg
dc.contributor.authorBihs, Hans
dc.contributor.authorÆsøy, Vilmar
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Eilif
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-17T08:25:24Z
dc.date.available2019-01-17T08:25:24Z
dc.date.created2018-12-18T15:21:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 2018, 140 (6), 061806-1-061806-7.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0892-7219
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2580997
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, numerical simulations of nonlinear sloshing in rectangular tanks are presented. Model implementations in the open source software reef3d are tested, and the results are compared with experimental data from three different conditions. The interface location is compared for both linear and nonlinear sloshing. The nonlinear sloshing is simulated in both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D). Video images from the SPHERIC project are compared with simulations for the interface. A condition with lateral wave impacts in sloshing, with a frequency close to the natural frequency of the first mode, can be found in this case. The numerical model is solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the k–ω turbulence model. The level set method is used to capture the interface. Higher order discretization schemes are implemented to handle time-evolution and convective fluxes. A ghost cell method is used to account for solid boundaries and parallel computations. It is found that the limiting factor for the eddy-viscosity has significant influence in the nonlinear sloshing cases. As the sloshing becomes more violent, the increased strain at the gas–liquid interface overproduces turbulence energy with unrealistically high damping of the motion. Three-dimensional simulations show slightly better comparison than 2D. Due to nonlinearities and small damping, the time to reach steady-state may take several cycles. The last case shows promising results for the global motion. As expected, the breakup of the liquid surface makes it difficult to resolve each phase. But overall, the numerical model predicts the sloshing motion reasonably well.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherASMEnb_NO
dc.titleComputational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Nonlinear Sloshing in a Rotating Rectangular Tank Using the Level Set Methodnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber061806-1-061806-7nb_NO
dc.source.volume140nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineeringnb_NO
dc.source.issue6nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4040560
dc.identifier.cristin1645102
dc.description.localcodeThis article will not be available due to copyright restrictions (c) 2018 by ASMEnb_NO
cristin.unitcode194,64,93,0
cristin.unitcode194,64,91,0
cristin.unitcode194,64,20,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for havromsoperasjoner og byggteknikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for bygg- og miljøteknikk
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for marin teknikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel