• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for samfunns- og utdanningsvitenskap (SU)
  • Institutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for samfunns- og utdanningsvitenskap (SU)
  • Institutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Alarming ambiguities : an analysis of Norwegian public documents concerning child obesity

Røsand, Trine
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
Trine Røsand.pdf (1.450Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2401686
Date
2016
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for pedagogikk og livslang læring [2227]
Abstract
In the public domain, overweight and obesity are usually presented as an alarming health

problem in need of fixing. There has been an increase in average body weight in many counties

across the world in the last 30 years. The reasons for this are numerous, and rest both in modern

society, biology and personal lifestyles. Responsibility for altering the situation is also divided.

The societal responsibility frame identifies it as society’s job, while the personal responsibility

frame defines it as individual’s obligation. At the same time concerns around problem

formulation, reasoning and responsibility to a broader extent are diverse and less obvious.

Similarly, there are many perspectives and assumptions concerning children.

This study has looked at how overweight and obesity are understood and handled by the

Norwegian Government and health authorities, and what ideas about children they rely on.

Theoretically, this study has been informed by social studies of children and childhood, and

sociology of health and illness. The method of document analysis has been used, and ten public

documents giving premises for the Norwegian health care service were analyzed using thematic

analysis. The child perspectives and understanding a phenomenon have been main perspectives

in approaching the documents.

Findings from the study show that the documents rely on a certain hegemonic ideology

concerning excess body weight, constructing it as a great problem. Main reasons are said to be

a modern health debilitating society, and individual lifestyle behavior in terms of physical

activity and diet. The responsibility is placed mainly on society, and societal solution proposed

to handle the problem are changing personal behavior, regulating societal structures and

prevention efforts. Children are positioned both as competent and dependent, within a landscape

of various views focusing mainly on children’s significance as future human beings. However,

an important finding was the alarming ambiguities concerning both in the formulation of the

“obesity problem”, the logic behind it and the construction and positioning of the child.

Reliance lies on the ideology of overweight as inherently health hazardous, which together with

simple explanatory frames may allow for moralizing behaviors in society towards overweight

and obese individuals. Society’s role in maintaining health in the population can cause

pedagogies about the self being imposed on and affecting people. The ambiguous construction

of children in society, and of overweight and obesity may lead to difficulties in implementing

appropriate measures in handling the situation. There is a need for more research from social

sciences, focusing on what the problem is presented to be.
Publisher
NTNU

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit