Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGouldthorpe, Craig
dc.contributor.authorAncoli-Israel, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorCash, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorInnominato, Pasquale
dc.contributor.authorJakobsen, Gunnhild
dc.contributor.authorLévi, Francis
dc.contributor.authorMiaskowski, Christine
dc.contributor.authorParganiha, Arti
dc.contributor.authorPati, Atanu Kumar
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Deidre
dc.contributor.authorRevell, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorZeitzer, Jamie M.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T13:38:59Z
dc.date.available2023-11-03T13:38:59Z
dc.date.created2023-09-01T11:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCancers. 2023, 15 (15), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3100569
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Circadian rest–Activity Rhythm Disorders (CARDs) are common in patients with cancer, particularly in advanced disease. CARDs are associated with increased symptom burden, poorer quality of life, and shorter survival. Research and reporting practices lack standardization, and formal diagnostic criteria do not exist. This electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) study aimed to formulate international recommendations for the assessment and diagnosis of CARDs in patients with cancer. Methods: An international e-Delphi was performed using an online platform (Welphi). Round 1 developed statements regarding circadian rest–activity rhythms, diagnostic criteria, and assessment techniques. Rounds 2 and 3 involved participants rating their level of agreement with the statements and providing comments until consensus (defined internally as 67%) and stability between rounds were achieved. Recommendations were then created and distributed to participants for comments before being finalized. Results: Sixteen participants from nine different clinical specialties and seven different countries, with 5–35 years of relevant research experience, were recruited, and thirteen participants completed all three rounds. Of the 164 generated statements, 66% achieved consensus, and responses were stable between the final two rounds. Conclusions: The e-Delphi resulted in international recommendations for assessing and diagnosing CARDs in patients with cancer. These recommendations should ensure standardized research and reporting practices in future studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleInternational e-Delphi Consensus Recommendations for the Assessment and Diagnosis of Circadian rest–Activity Rhythm Disorders (CARDs) in Patients with Canceren_US
dc.title.alternativeInternational e-Delphi Consensus Recommendations for the Assessment and Diagnosis of Circadian rest–Activity Rhythm Disorders (CARDs) in Patients with Canceren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalCancersen_US
dc.source.issue15en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers15153784
dc.identifier.cristin2171622
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal