A prospective study of pulmonary outcomes and chest computed tomography in the first year after COVID-19
Lerum, Tøri Vigeland; Meltzer, Carin; Rivero, Jezabel Rodriguez; Aaløkken, Trond Mogens; Brønstad, Eivind; Aarli, Bernt Bøgvald; Lund, Kristine Marie Aarberg; Durheim, Michael Thomas; Ashraf, Haseem; Einvik, Gunnar; Skjønsberg, Ole Henning; Stavem, Knut
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3080120Utgivelsesdato
2023Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
- Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk [1860]
- Publikasjoner fra CRIStin - NTNU [37221]
- St. Olavs hospital [2441]
Originalversjon
European Respiratory Journal Open Research (ERJ Open Research). 2023, 9 (2), . 10.1183/23120541.00575-2022Sammendrag
COVID-19 primarily affects the respiratory system. We aimed to evaluate how pulmonary outcomes develop after COVID-19 by assessing participants from the first pandemic wave prospectively 3 and 12 months following hospital discharge.
Pulmonary outcomes included self-reported dyspnoea assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale, 6-min walk distance (6MWD), spirometry, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), body plethysmography and chest computed tomography (CT). Chest CT was repeated at 12 months in participants with pathological findings at 3 months. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale for clinical improvement defined disease severity in the acute phase.
Of 262 included COVID-19 patients, 245 (94%) and 222 (90%) participants attended the 3- and 12-month follow-up, respectively. Self-reported dyspnoea and 6MWD remained unchanged between the two time points, while DLCO and total lung capacity improved (0.28 mmol·min−1·kPa−1, 95% CI 0.12–0.44, and 0.13 L, 95% CI 0.02–0.24, respectively). The prevalence of fibrotic-like findings on chest CT at 3 and 12 months in those with follow-up chest CT was unaltered. Those with more severe disease had worse dyspnoea, DLCO and total lung capacity values than those with mild disease.
There was an overall positive development of pulmonary outcomes from 3 to 12 months after hospital discharge. The discrepancy between the unaltered prevalence of self-reported dyspnoea and the improvement in pulmonary function underscores the complexity of dyspnoea as a prominent factor of long-COVID. The lack of increase in fibrotic-like findings from 3 to 12 months suggests that SARS-CoV-2 does not induce a progressive fibrotic process in the lungs.