Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGagnat, Yngvild
dc.contributor.authorOudenhoven, Laura M.
dc.contributor.authorBrændvik, Siri Merete
dc.contributor.authorBardal, Ellen Marie
dc.contributor.authorRoeleveld, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T13:38:33Z
dc.date.available2023-04-14T13:38:33Z
dc.date.created2022-10-07T09:29:21Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGait & Posture. 2022, 98 146-152.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063181
dc.description.abstractBackground Energy cost (EC) of comfortable walking is often used in clinical evaluation of children with altered gait function. EC is presented as energy expenditure per kg bodyweight per meter, either in total (grossEC) or in addition to resting energy expenditure (netEC). GrossEC is considered more reliable and netEC less affected by between-subject variations in speed, age, and body size. However, the effect of the individual child’s speed on EC is rarely considered, while altered gait function may affect both speed and EC. Research question To what extent are grossEC and netEC affected by within-subject variation in speed and between-subject variations in speed, age, and body size? Methods Forty-two typically developing children (7–15 y) were included in this cross-sectional study. Age, height, and bodyweight were obtained. Breath-to-breath gas-exchange measures of VO2 and VCO2 were conducted during rest and five over-ground gait conditions: walking at slow, comfortable, and fast speed, jogging and running. All conditions lasted 3–5 min. Body surface area, non-dimensional speed, grossEC, and netEC were calculated. Regression analyses and mixed model analyses were conducted to explain the effect of speed, age, and body size on variations in EC. Results GrossEC showed a non-significant, concave up relation to within-subject variation in speed, with a minimum around comfortable/fast walking speed. NetEC had a strong positive linear relation to within-subject variation in speed. For each gait condition, grossEC was more affected by between-subject variations in speed, age, and body size compared to netEC. However, the effect of age and body size was not eliminated for netEC but was quadratic. Significance Although normalised to speed and bodyweight, grossEC and netEC are still affected by those factors. However, they are affected differently for within- and between-subject variations. This must be considered when interpreting EC in children in relation to gait function.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleEnergy cost of gait in children and the effect of speed, age, and body sizeen_US
dc.title.alternativeEnergy cost of gait in children and the effect of speed, age, and body sizeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber146-152en_US
dc.source.volume98en_US
dc.source.journalGait & Postureen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.09.005
dc.identifier.cristin2059418
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal