Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHosseini, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorJavanroodi, Kavan
dc.contributor.authorHosseini, Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorNik, Vahid M.
dc.contributor.authorJavanroodi, Kavan
dc.contributor.authorJavanroodi, Kavan
dc.contributor.authorNik, Vahid m.
dc.contributor.authorNik, Vahid m.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-31T08:01:32Z
dc.date.available2023-03-31T08:01:32Z
dc.date.created2022-04-11T09:52:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSustainable Cities and Society (SCS). 2022, 78 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2210-6707
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3061309
dc.description.abstractClimate change and urbanization are two major challenges when planning for sustainable energy transition in cities. The common approach for energy demand estimation is using only typical meso-scale weather data in building energy models (BEMs), which underestimates the impacts of extreme climate and microclimate variations. To quantify the impacts of such underestimation on assessing the future energy performance of buildings, this study simulates a high spatiotemporal resolution BEM for two representative residential buildings located in a 600 × 600 m2 urban area in Southeast Sweden while accounting for both climate change and microclimate. Future climate data are synthesized using 13 future climate scenarios over 2010-2099, divided into three 30-year periods, and microclimate data are generated considering the urban morphology of the area. It is revealed that microclimate can cause 17% rise in cooling degree-day (CDD) and 7% reduction in heating degree-day (HDD) on average compared to mesoclimate. Considering typical weather conditions, CDD increases by 45% and HDD decreases by 8% from one 30-year period to another. Differences can become much larger during extreme weather conditions. For example, CDD can increase by 500% in an extreme warm July compared to a typical one. Results also indicate that annual cooling demand becomes four and five times bigger than 2010-2039 in 2040-2069 and 2070-2099, respectively. The daily peak cooling load can increase up to 25% in an extreme warm day when accounting for microclimate. In the absence of cooling systems during extreme warm days, the indoor temperature stays above 26°C continuously over a week and reaches above 29.2°C. Moreover, the annual overheating hours can increase up to 140% in the future. These all indicate that not accounting for influencing climate variations can result in maladaptation or insufficient adaptation of urban areas to climate change.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103634
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHigh-resolution impact assessment of climate change on building energy performance considering extreme weather events and microclimate – Investigating variations in indoor thermal comfort and degree-daysen_US
dc.title.alternativeHigh-resolution impact assessment of climate change on building energy performance considering extreme weather events and microclimate – Investigating variations in indoor thermal comfort and degree-daysen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber21en_US
dc.source.volume78en_US
dc.source.journalSustainable Cities and Society (SCS)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scs.2021.103634
dc.identifier.cristin2016610
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal