Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDezert, Theo
dc.contributor.authorKiplesund, Geir Helge
dc.contributor.authorSigtryggsdottir, Fjola Gudrun
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T15:08:12Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T15:08:12Z
dc.date.created2022-09-09T12:03:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWater. 2022, 14 (17), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3045966
dc.description.abstractThere are increasing demands from dam safety regulations and guidelines to upgrade the rockfill dams, especially in Norway where over 180 large rockfill dams are present. To protect the hydraulic structure against overtopping events or leakages, it is important to use defence mechanisms such as a protective layer of riprap on the downstream slope. In this article, we display 9 experimental setups of riprap, conducted at the hydraulic laboratory of NTNU (Trondheim) and subjected to overtopping phenomena with increasing water discharge, until the complete failure of the model. These tests were performed on models with dumped and placed riprap, with or without toe support, with or without the downstream rockfill shoulder, and finally on models with a full dam profile. The models with downstream rockfill shoulder as well as with full dam profiles allowed for throughflow. The model behaviour during these experimental tests is described and discussed, according to their respective critical discharge values and associated failure mechanisms. Limitations are also discussed. The results bring to light the benefit of placed riprap compared to dumped riprap structures. As the results show a placed riprap can withstand a significantly higher overtopping discharge than a dumped riprap. Also, the use of toe support enables a significant increase of resistance against overtopping of placed riprap structures. However, toe supports have not proven any significant improvement in stability for dumped riprap structures. This research also puts forward that dumped riprap undergoes a surface erosion process with smaller slides. Placed riprap undergoes a sliding failure mechanism when unsupported at the toe, and a buckling deformation when supported.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectDambrudden_US
dc.subjectDambreaken_US
dc.subjectDam failureen_US
dc.subjectDam failureen_US
dc.titleRiprap Protection Exposed to Overtopping Phenomena: A Review of Laboratory Experimental Modelsen_US
dc.title.alternativeRiprap Protection Exposed to Overtopping Phenomena: A Review of Laboratory Experimental Modelsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Hydroteknologi: 538en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Hydrotechnology: 538en_US
dc.source.pagenumber14en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalWateren_US
dc.source.issue17en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w14172722
dc.identifier.cristin2050279
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257588en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal