Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKillingberg, Kristin Toftaker
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Tarje Onsøien
dc.contributor.authorFløtten, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorBrustugun, Odd Terje
dc.contributor.authorHORNSLIEN, KJERSTI
dc.contributor.authorMadebo, Tesfaye
dc.contributor.authorLanger, Seppo W.
dc.contributor.authorSchytte, Tine
dc.contributor.authorRisum, Signe
dc.contributor.authorTsakonas, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorNyman, Jan
dc.contributor.authorEngleson, Jens
dc.contributor.authorGrønberg, Bjørn Henning
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-14T10:24:11Z
dc.date.available2022-12-14T10:24:11Z
dc.date.created2022-03-30T09:15:10Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLung Cancer. 2022, 166 49-57.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-5002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3037652
dc.description.abstractObjectives In a randomized phase II trial, twice daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improved survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Notably, the higher dose did not cause more toxicity. Here we present health related quality of life (HRQoL) reported by the trial participants during the first 2 years. Materials and methods 170 patients were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 45 Gy or 60 Gy concurrently with cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The 150 patients who commenced TRT and completed a minimum of one HRQoL-questionnaire were included in the present study. Patients reported HRQoL on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 and Lung Cancer 13 Quality of Life Questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed weeks 0, 4 (before TRT), 8 (end of TRT), 12 (response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy) and 16 (end of prophylactic cranial irradiation), then every 10 weeks year one, and every 3 months year two. Primary HRQoL endpoints were dysphagia and dyspnea. A difference in mean score of ≥10 was defined as clinically significant. Results Maximum dysphagia was reported on week 8, with no significant difference between treatment arms (mean scores 45 Gy: 44.2, 60 Gy: 51.1). The 60 Gy arm had more dysphagia in the convalescence period, but dysphagia scores returned to baseline levels at week 16 in both arms. For dyspnea there were no significant changes, or differences between treatment arms, at any timepoint. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any other HRQoL-scales. Conclusion TRT of 60 Gy did not cause significantly higher maximum dysphagia, though patients on the 60 Gy arm reported more dysphagia the first 8 weeks of convalescence. The higher dose was well tolerated and is an attractive alternative to current TRT schedules in LS SCLC.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePatient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung canceren_US
dc.title.alternativePatient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung canceren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber49-57en_US
dc.source.volume166en_US
dc.source.journalLung Canceren_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002
dc.identifier.cristin2013580
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal