Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFarup, Per Grønaas
dc.contributor.authorBlix, Ivar
dc.contributor.authorFørre, Sigurd
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Gjermund
dc.contributor.authorLange, Ove Juel
dc.contributor.authorJohannessen, Rune
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, Hermod
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T11:38:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T13:34:46Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T11:38:56Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T13:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research 2011, 11nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/300603
dc.description.abstractBackground: Optimal treatment gives complete relief of symptoms of many disorders. But even if such treatment is available, some patients have persisting complaints. One disorder, from which the patients should achieve complete relief of symptoms with medical or surgical treatment, is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Despite the fact that such treatment is cheap, safe and easily available; some patients have persistent complaints after contact with the health services. This study evaluates the causes of treatment failure. Methods: Twelve patients with GERD and persistent complaints had a semi-structured interview which focused on the patients’ evaluation of treatment failure. The interviews were taped, transcribed and evaluated by 18 physicians, (six general practitioners, six gastroenterologists and six gastrointestinal surgeons) who completed a questionnaire for each patient. The questionnaires were scored, and the relative responsibility for the failure was attributed to the patient, primary care, secondary care and interaction in the health services. Results: Failing interaction in the health services was the most important cause of treatment failure, followed by failure in primary care, secondary care and the patient himself; the relative responsibilities were 35%, 28%, 27% and 10% respectively. There was satisfactory agreement about the causes between doctors with different specialities, but significant inter-individual differences between the doctors. The causes of the failures differed between the patients. Conclusions: Treatment failure is a complex problem. Inadequate interaction in the health services seems to be important. Improved communication between parts of the health services and with the patients are areas of improvement.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.titleWhat causes treatment failure - the patient, primary care, secondary care or inadequate interaction in the health services?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-09-11T11:38:56Z
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue111nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-11-111
dc.identifier.cristin835477
dc.description.localcode© 2011 Farup et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel