Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRøsstad, Tove
dc.contributor.authorGaråsen, Helge
dc.contributor.authorSteinsbekk, Aslak
dc.contributor.authorSletvold, Olav
dc.contributor.authorGrimsmo, Anders
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T11:44:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-17T13:18:07Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T11:44:26Z
dc.date.available2015-09-17T13:18:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research 2013, 13(121):1-9nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/300590
dc.description.abstractBackground: Different models for care pathways involving both specialist and primary care have been developed to ensure adequate follow-up after discharge. These care pathways have mainly been developed and run by specialist care and have been disease-based. In this study, primary care providers took the initiative to develop a model for integrated care pathways across care levels for older patients in need of home care services after discharge. Initially, the objective was to develop pathways for patients diagnosed with heart failure, COPD and stroke. The aim of this paper is to investigate the process and the experiences of the participants in this developmental work. The participants were drawn from three hospitals, six municipalities and patient organizations in Central Norway. Methods: This qualitative study used focus group interviews, written material and observations. Representatives from the hospitals, municipalities and patient organizations taking part in the development process were chosen as informants. Results: The development process was very challenging because of the differing perspectives on care and different organizational structures in specialist care and primary care. In this study, the disease perspective, being dominant in specialist care, was not found to be suitable for use in primary health care because of the need to cover a broader perspective including the patient’s functioning, social situation and his or her preferences. Furthermore, managing several different disease-based care pathways was found to be unsuitable in home care services, as well as unsuitable for a population characterized by a substantial degree of comorbidity. The outcome of the development process was a consensus that outlined a single, common patient-centred care pathway for transition from hospital to follow-up in primary care. The pathway was suitable for most common diseases and included functional and social aspects as well as disease follow-up, thus merging the differing perspectives. The disease-based care pathways were kept for use within the hospitals. Conclusions: Disease-based care pathways for older patients were found to be neither feasible nor sustainable in primary care. A common patient-centred care pathway that could meet the needs of multi- morbid patients was recommended. Keywords: Care coordination, Continuity of patient care, Healthcare disparities, Multi-morbidity, Patient discharge, Primary care, Home care services, Interdisciplinary communication, Organizational culture, Health services for the aged.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.titleDevelopment of a patient centred care pathway across health care providers: a qualitative studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer revieweden_GB
dc.date.updated2015-09-11T11:44:26Z
dc.source.volume13nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue121nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-13-121
dc.identifier.cristin1022660
dc.description.localcode© 2013 Røsstad et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel