Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Marit Løtveit
dc.contributor.authorJozefiak, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSund, Anne Mari
dc.contributor.authorHolen, Solveig
dc.contributor.authorNeumer, Simon-Peter
dc.contributor.authorMartinsen, Kristin D.
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, Lene Mari P.
dc.contributor.authorPatras, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorLydersen, Stian
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T11:40:51Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T11:40:51Z
dc.date.created2021-12-14T11:45:49Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychology. 2021, 9 (1), 1-12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2050-7283
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2983117
dc.description.abstractBackground Prevention is essential to reduce the development of symptomology among children and adolescents into disorders, thereby improving public health and reducing costs. Therefore, easily administered screening and early assessment methods with good reliability and validity are necessary to effectively identify children’s functioning and how these develop. The Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) is an instrument designed for this purpose. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the BPM parent (BPM-P) and teacher (BPM-T) versions, including internal reliability and construct validity at assessing children with internalizing problems. Methods Baseline data were collected from a national randomized controlled intervention study. Children aged 8–12 years with self-reported symptoms of anxiety and/or depression with one standard deviation above a chosen population’s mean were included in this study. Teachers (n = 750) and parents (n = 596) rated children using the BPM-T and BPM-P, respectively. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, and multi-informant agreement between the BPM-P and BPM-T was measured using Spearman’s correlations. Construct validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis. Results Internal consistency was good throughout all domains for both the BPM-P and BPM-T, with a Cronbach’s alpha ranging from .763 to .878. Multi-informant agreement between the parents and the teacher was moderate on the externalizing, attention, and total scales and low on the internalizing scale. The model fit for the three-factor structure of the BPM was excellent for the BPM-P and good for the BPM-T. Conclusions Internal consistency was good, and the original three-factor solution of the BPM-P and BPM-T was confirmed based on our sample of school children at-risk for emotional problems. These promising results indicate that the BPM may be a valid short assessment tool for measuring attentional, behavioral, and internalizing problems in children.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePsychometric properties of the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) in children with internalizing symptoms: examining baseline data from a national randomized controlled intervention studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Psychologyen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40359-021-00689-1
dc.identifier.cristin1968292
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal