• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for arkitektur og design (AD)
  • Institutt for arkitektur og planlegging
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for arkitektur og design (AD)
  • Institutt for arkitektur og planlegging
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Boundaries to Socially and Enviromentally Equitable Communal Spaces - Finding Common Ground for a Sustainable Urban Existence in Multicultural Oslo

Murphy, Melissa Anna
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
Melissa Murphy.pdf (Locked)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/298079
Date
2011
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Institutt for arkitektur og planlegging [268]
Abstract
During periods of urban renewal, neighborhoods change at a rapid pace. Developers

and land owners with resources renovate and build newer and nicer to attract a

different market of residents to previously run-down neighborhoods. Through the

process, people of varying societal sectors become neighbors, suddenly having

(perhaps only) the element of public and communal space in common - despite

broad demographic differences. This thesis examines communal space within a

disparate, changing residential neighborhood of Oslo as a potential basis for creating

sustainable, mutually reinforcing social and environmental coexistences.

If sustainability is a goal in today’s cities, as generally defi ned by the United

Nations after Agenda 21 as the balance of equities between Social, Ecological,

and Economic components, then the question this thesis asks is - how can a

neighborhood in change promote sustainability and a harmonious coexistence of

its residents in the midst of urban renewal - where economic inequity is inherent?

Where is common ground for all residents of a place, and what are the potentials of

that ground for promoting a more sustainable urban existence - environmentally and

socially if not economically?

This study examines many of the equity issues faced by Oslo’s changing and

multicultural inner-east neighborhoods of Tøyen and Grønland - immigration,

gentrifi cation, fragmentation, discrimination, social ignorance and fear, uneven

resources and participation. Such problems apply to many of today’s cities - inequity

here has been legislated out of the government but remains buried in the subtle

layers which compose and infl uence rental and real estate structures. Within these

structures, differences between people - exercised in the built environment and its

use - are creating limitations and boundaries to social and environmental equities.

The society is as fragmented as the divided yard spaces found in the study site and

residents often have no basis for identifying with their diverse neighbors despite

proximity and shared infrastructure.

Equity and sustainability topics are a matter of values and depend on what people

see as important to their personal lives. Such values, however, differ between

residents and among stakeholder groups within neighborhoods - the lack of

communal values being capable of hindering the potentials for sustainable

coexistence. The research project is specifi cally guided by the question: How do

value disparities hinder social and environmental equity potentials of communal

spaces in a context of inherent economic inequity? From understanding privately

owned communal spaces as a part and potential resource of the greater city to

deriving local values and motivating factors in its management, the analysis attempts

to bridge societal sectors and city agendas. The fi eldwork for this thesis revolved

around defi ning the values of stakeholder groups, noting where differences occur,

and then analyzing the boundaries being reinforced by found unaligned values.

Utilizing theoretical context including topics of Sustainable Cities, Urban Renewal

and Gentrifi cation, Multicultural Neighborhoods, and Housing Theory, indicator values

of community, identity, diversity, shared space, nature, upkeep and participation were

selected. These indicator values serve as a basis for comparison of a selected range

of communal yards - what values residents and property owners claim to have, what

values are demonstrated by the built environment, and what values are demonstrated

by the usage of the built environment. Such values are derived from cases through

balancing principles from both architectural determinism and behaviorism thought.

The thesis hopes to identify causes of socio-spatial boundaries at work in the study

area which can then targeted in future planning measures to encourage more

equitable communal spaces despite the common context of economic difference and

income inequality.
Publisher
NTNU

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit