Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBøckmann, Eirik
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-28T07:38:53Z
dc.date.available2015-05-28T07:38:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-326-0702-0
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-326-0703-7
dc.identifier.issn1503-8181
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/284142
dc.description.abstractPropelling a boat forward by converting wave energy into propulsive thrust was first proposed in 1858 and first successfully done in practice in the 1890s - to the author's knowledge. Several experimenters have since demonstrated the feasibility of wave-powered boats, both in model and full scale. The most common type of wave-powered boat, and also the type studied in this thesis, is a boat with foils that convert the vertical motion in waves into propulsive thrust. In addition to saving fuel, another benefit of these foils, called wavefoils in this thesis, is that they significantly reduce the most violent vessel motions. Previous theoretical models of wavefoils have neglected the effect of stall, which is reasonable only for small wave height and/or if the ship speed is high. To be able to simulate all wave conditions in real-time or faster, a slightly modified version of the Leishman-Beddoes dynamic stall model for the wavefoil forces was implemented in the time-domain ship simulator VeSim from MARINTEK. This model was compared with experiments and was found to give good estimates of the average foil thrust, although the experimental force histories were not always well reproduced by the model. The drawback of a spring-loaded wavefoil, which is commonly used to reduce the maximum angle of attack below the stall limit, is that the spring stiffness needs to be tuned for the instantaneous wave condition. In this thesis, two experiments where the foil was pitched automatically by a motor - so-called active pitch control - are presented. A model of a platform supply vessel was outfitted with a wavefoil with pressure sensors on and near the leading edge. The purpose of the pressure sensors was to relate the leading-edge pressure to the angle of attack. The actively pitch-controlled foil resulted in less ship resistance in waves than the fixed foil in some cases but could potentially have performed better with a stiffer pitch actuation mechanism. Another method of pitch control, where freely-rotating vanes near the foil detected the angle of attack, was also tested, with an improved pitch actuation mechanism. This method of pitch control relies on the value of a parameter in the control algorithm to result in reduced ship resistance, and this was also observed in the experiments. A spring-loaded foil was tested without the ship model and produced higher thrust than the actively pitch-controlled foil with angle of attack vanes. The added mass force is believed to have caused a more beneficial pitch motion for the springloaded foil than for the vane-based pitch-controlled foil. The experiments were compared with simulations in VeSim. Foil thrust and ship motions agreed fairly well in simulations and experiments, but there was less agreement for the ship resistance. At moderate speed, pitching the foil, either actively with a motor or passively with a spring, was shown to only be important for the wave periods producing the most violent ship motions. Simulated fuel savings for the vessel operating in irregular waves, with one wave height and three wave periods commonly found in the North Sea, were well above 30% when sailing at 8 knots for several wave directions but decreased with increasing speed. A ship entirely powered by renewable energy was proposed and simulated. The ship was propelled by wind and wave energy using wingsails and wavefoils, while solar panels provided the necessary electricity for onboard use. Sailing between the Azores and Madeira, round-trip, the expected ship speed was 5-6 knots with a standard deviation of approximately 4 knots, for all four seasons. Experiments were performed with a small radio-controlled ship model, outfitted with a spring-loaded wavefoil underneath the bulb. The influence of the springstiffness on the ship speed was small in the experiments, and this was also found in simulations. Although the wavefoil was only beneficial for two of the three wave periods tested in the experiments, and only in head seas, simulations showed that the wavefoil is much more beneficial in full scale.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNTNUnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDoctoral thesis at NTNU;2015:16
dc.titleWave Propulsion of Shipsnb_NO
dc.typeDoctoral thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500::Marine technology: 580nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel