Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJünge, Gabriele Hofinger
dc.contributor.authorAlfnes, Erlend
dc.contributor.authorNujen, Bella B.
dc.contributor.authorEmblemsvåg, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKjersem, Kristina
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-13T06:35:30Z
dc.date.available2021-10-13T06:35:30Z
dc.date.created2021-03-31T17:55:57Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationProduction planning & control (Print). 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0953-7287
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2789485
dc.description.abstractThis article explores how waste reduction approaches as found in lean thinking can be applied to engineering design in Engineer-To-Order (ETO) projects based on a multiple case study of ten companies over a 2-year period. ETO projects deliver capital goods that are customised to individual customer requirements. Customisation and ultimately value generation are achieved through an iterative engineering design process. Although inevitable, iterative engineering design allows much leeway for waste generation, expressed in higher costs and longer lead times. Accordingly, this paper investigates the iterative nature of engineering design in current practice and discusses how these iterations create wastes. It applies the concept of lean engineering design and elaborates on how this concept can eliminate wastes. The findings extend the literature on lean thinking by demonstrating its applicability to engineering design and provide a unique description of the most common wastes found in ETO projects. Furthermore, this article provides managerial implications on how lean engineering design can eliminate wastes and ultimately improve ETO project performance based on lessons learned from the case companies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUnderstanding and eliminating waste in Engineer-To-Order (ETO) projects: a multiple case studyen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber17en_US
dc.source.journalProduction planning & control (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09537287.2021.1903279
dc.identifier.cristin1901867
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal