Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSparrevik, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorDe Boer, Luitzen
dc.contributor.authorMichelsen, Ottar
dc.contributor.authorSkaar, Christofer
dc.contributor.authorKnudson, Haley
dc.contributor.authorFet, Annik Magerholm
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-27T07:27:59Z
dc.date.available2021-09-27T07:27:59Z
dc.date.created2021-02-23T12:15:36Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment Systems and Decisions. 2021, 41 (3), 392-400.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-5403
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2783592
dc.description.abstractThe construction sector is progressively becoming more circular by reducing waste, re-using building materials and adopting regenerative solutions for energy production and biodiversity protection. The implications of circularity on construction activities are complex and require the careful evaluation of impacts to select the appropriate path forward. Evaluations of circular solutions and their environmental efectiveness are often performed based on various types of life cycle-based impact assessments. This paper uses systemic thinking to map and evaluate diferent impact assessment methodologies and their implications for a shift to more circular solutions. The following systemic levels are used to group the methodologies: product (material life cycle declarations and building assessments), organisation (certifcation and management schemes) and system (policies, standards and regulations). The results confrm that circular economy is integrated at all levels. However, development and structure are not coordinated or governed unidirectionally, but rather occur simultaneously at diferent levels. This recursive structure is positive if the methods are applied in the correct context, thus providing both autonomy and cohesion in decision making. Methods at lower systemic levels may then improve production processes and stimulate the market to create circular and innovative building solutions, whereas methods at higher systemic levels can be used, for example, by real estate builders, trade organisations and governments to create incentives for circular development and innovation in a broader perspective. Use of the performance methods correctly within an actor network is therefore crucial for successful and efective implementation of circular economy in the construction sector.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.urihttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10669-021-09803-5
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCircular economy in the construction sector: advancing environmental performance through systemic and holistic thinkingen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber392-400en_US
dc.source.volume41en_US
dc.source.journalEnvironment Systems and Decisionsen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10669-021-09803-5
dc.identifier.cristin1892708
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal