Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHamdan, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorDe Boer, Luitzen
dc.contributor.authorHamdy, Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T08:38:55Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T08:38:55Z
dc.date.created2021-01-20T08:06:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-536-1686-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725279
dc.description.abstractEnergy Performance Contracting (EPC) is a method to finance energy efficiency investments from cost savings in the building sector. Under an EPC arrangement, an external organization, an Energy Service Company (ESCO), initiates a project to achieve energy efficiency in a building. It uses the stream of income from the cost savings to repay their investments. ESCOs and EPC are a desirable mechanism to capture cost-effective energy-efficiency potentials with the private sector’s involvement. In public projects, public procurement and green public procurement are the carrying vehicles of EPC where public clients use public procurement procedures and functionalities to select the right ESCO before landing on a suitable EPC agreement. In other words, public procurement is a prerequisite to EPC in public building projects. Though EPC has received much attention in the building sector and can probably be considered among the most effective mechanisms for energy efficiency in the public sector, very few studies have looked at EPC from a public procurement perspective. The current report aims to explore the link between green public procurement (GPP) and energy performance contracting (EPC) and propose improvement opportunities for EPC capitalizing on knowledge and practices derived from GPP. In the current report, we discuss an approach to improve EPC presence in the public and residential sectors. That is, capitalizing on GPP practices, using bundling and scaling up strategies, and managing complexity. First, anchoring EPC projects in GPP will generally improve the project’s environmental performance and ensure the selection of a qualified ESCO, especially since Norway is in an advanced position when it comes to implementing green solutions in public expenditures. Seeing EPC projects as part of the broader public procurement system may bring benefits to EPC’s future in Norway. As a result, positioning EPCs as GPPs will not only benefit the EPCs, by may also lead to an increase in the awareness and acceptance of ESCOs among public and private clients. Second, pooling or bundling renovation efforts into larger blocks can be conducive to benefit from economies of scale. More extensive projects could be used to attract ESCOs in smaller municipalities. Lastly, managing complexity in EPC projects might translate to better collaboration between the involved parties. In other words, knowing when and where to let complexity emerge could probably improve collaboration throughout the stages of EPC projects.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSINTEF Academic Press; NTNUen_US
dc.relation.ispartofZEN Report
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZEN Report;29
dc.relation.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725175
dc.subjectgreen public procurementen_US
dc.subjectenergy performance contractingen_US
dc.subjectGPPen_US
dc.subjectEPCen_US
dc.titleGreen public procurement and energy performance contracting: exploring the linkage and improvement opportunitiesen_US
dc.typeResearch reporten_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber30en_US
dc.source.issue29en_US
dc.identifier.cristin1875040
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 257660en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel